AD/HU 269/97 - Rotor Blades

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B10655 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 


Schweizer (Hughes) 269 Series Helicopters

 

AD/HU 269/97 Rotor Blades  2/91 DM

Applicability: All model 269A, 269A-1, 269B and 269C with Main Rotor Blades P/N 269A1160; 269A1185, -1, -1M, -7 and/or Tail Rotor Blades P/N 269A1185-1M; 269A6035-23,

with the S/Nos listed in the AD Requirement.

 

Requirement:  Pending completion of an investigation currently being undertaken to confirm the airworthiness of certain overhauled/repaired main/tail rotor blades with P/Nos and S/Nos detailed herein, accomplishment of the following is required:

 

  1. Main and tail rotor blades. Inspect and determine whether installed blades have affected P/N and S/N. Blades not affected require no further action.

 

Main rotor blade P/N 269A1160 Serial Numbers:

0569, 0616, 0834, 0856, 0867, 0871, 0894,0913, 0966, 0988, 1008, 1134, 1138,

1143, 1163, 1569, 1593, 1808, 2343, 2433, 2437, 2439, 2452, 2657, 2677, 2755,

2841, 2860, 2936, 2993, 3006, 3020, 3118, 3119, 3237, 3577, 3588, 3637, BD52.

 

Main rotor blade P/N 269A1185, -1, -1M Serial Numbers

0118, 0201, 0218, 0234, 0243, 0269, 0304, 0306, 0482, 0732, 0745, 0765, 0784,

0799, 0807, 0809, 0813, 0848, 0853, 0864, 0868, 0873, 0906, 0948, 0956, 0984,

1010, 1011, 1077, 1140, 1141, 1142, 1288, 1345, 1412, 1416, 1565, 1570, 1571,

1578, 1629, 1641, 1689, 1695, 1706, 1725, 1792, 1866, 1878, 1879, 1972, 2028,

2335, 2433, 2437, 2439, 2471, 2499, 2537, 2540, 2549, 2657, 2787, 2830, 2860,

2936, 3006, 3237, 3322, 3341, 3577.

 

Main rotor blade P/N 269A1185-7 Serial Numbers:

0482, 1565, 1578.

 

Tail rotor blade P/N 269A6035-23 Serial Number:

0579.

 

2.    Affected main rotor blades

 

Visually inspect leading edge abrasion strip attachment integrity. Any blisters, bubbling or lifting of the strip is cause for removal before further flight.

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 

3.    Affected tail rotor blades

 

(a)     Dye-penetrant and tap test per Part II of Schweizer SIN N-183.3.

 

(b)     Visually inspect each tail rotor blade abrasion strip for any evidence of bond failure along the abrasion strip/airfoil bond line.

 

Note: If evidence of separation along the abrasion strip/airfoil bond line is suspected; using a 10X magnifying glass, closely check along abrasion strip/airfoil bond line and at blade tip for any separation between epoxy adhesive and abrasion strip.

 

Any blade with void or bond separation beyond prescribed limits must be removed from service before further flight.

 

Compliance: 1. Within next 5 hours time in service after 14 December 1990.

 

2.    Within next 5 hours time in service after 14 December 1990 and thereafter at intervals not exceeding 50 hours time in service. Also prior to the first flight of each day the helicopter is to be operated.

 

3.    (a) Within next 5 hours time in service after 14 December 1990 and thereafter at intervals not exceeding 50 hours time in service.

 

(b) Within next 5 hours time in service after 14 December 1990 and thereafter prior to the first flight of each day the helicopter is to be operated.

 

Note: This Directive shall be entered on the Maintenance Release as maintenance required. The visual inspection required by Para 2 and 3 may be performed by the pilot in command, in which case certification is to be made by entering AD/HU269/97 against the daily inspection certification of the Maintenance Release. A copy of this Airworthiness Directive is to be kept in the aircraft.

 

Background:  An investigation in New Zealand has revealed that certain main and tail rotor blades repaired in that country had not been repaired in accordance with proper procedures (eg time expired adhesives etc).

 

The New Zealand CAA believe this to be a potentially serious safety of flight issue and that some of these blades are in Australia.

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended, include specific airworthiness directives to ensure the safety and reliability of aircraft in Australia. One such directive, AD/HU 269/97, pertains to Schweizer (Hughes) 269 Series Helicopters, aiming to address the potential safety risks associated with certain rotor blades that have been repaired or overhauled. This directive was enacted by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority to ensure compliance with airworthiness standards. The policy objective behind this directive is to mitigate any potential risks related to the use of these specific rotor blades, which were found to be repaired using improper procedures in New Zealand, and which may also be in use in Australia. Compliance with this directive requires specific inspections and, if necessary, the removal of certain rotor blades from service. For main rotor blades, the directive mandates a visual inspection of the leading edge abrasion strip attachment integrity, with any signs of damage necessitating the removal of the blade before further flight. Tail rotor blades are subject to dye-penetrant and tap testing, followed by a visual inspection for bond failure along the abrasion strip/airfoil bond line. Any blade showing voids or bond separation beyond prescribed limits must also be removed from service. These inspections must be conducted within specific timeframes after the directive's issuance and at regular intervals thereafter, ensuring ongoing safety and compliance with aviation standards.

Scope and Application

This legislative instrument, part of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, applies specifically to Schweizer (Hughes) 269 Series Helicopters with identified main and tail rotor blade part numbers and serial numbers. The directive is aimed at ensuring the airworthiness of these helicopters by mandating inspections and repairs of certain rotor blades. The geographic reach of this regulation is national, applying to all aircraft within Australia. Compliance with the requirements must be met within specified timeframes after a particular date and at intervals not exceeding 50 hours of service or prior to the first flight each day. The directive also requires documentation and certification by the pilot in command. This regulation does not specify any exclusions or exemptions but necessitates adherence to detailed inspection and repair procedures to maintain safety standards. The scope of the directive can be further defined through subordinate instruments, which may provide additional guidelines or specifications.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105 Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, include an Airworthiness Directive (AD) for Schweizer (Hughes) 269 Series Helicopters, identified as AD/HU 269/97, focusing on rotor blades. This directive applies to all model 269A, 269A-1, 269B and 269C helicopters with specified Main Rotor Blades part numbers (P/N) and Serial Numbers (S/Nos) listed within the AD requirement (section 2). The directive mandates that all affected blades must undergo specific inspections and tests to ensure airworthiness, with blades not affected by the specified part numbers and serial numbers requiring no further action. The AD imposes several obligations on the operators and maintainers of the affected helicopters. For the main rotor blades, operators must visually inspect the leading edge abrasion strip attachment integrity. Any signs of blisters, bubbling, or lifting of the strip require immediate removal of the blade before further flight. For the tail rotor blades, operators must perform a dye-penetrant and tap test in accordance with Part II of Schweizer SIN N-183, and visually inspect each tail rotor blade abrasion strip for any evidence of bond failure along the abrasion strip/airfoil bond line. If any separation beyond prescribed limits is detected, the blade must be removed from service before further flight. Operators must also ensure these inspections are carried out within specified time intervals and before the first flight of each day the helicopter is to be operated. Failure to comply with the requirements set out in this Airworthiness Directive can result in serious consequences. The AD stipulates that any helicopter found to be non-compliant with the inspection and maintenance requirements could be grounded, potentially leading to criminal charges or fines. The specific penalties for non-compliance are not detailed in the directive but typically include hefty fines and potential criminal charges under civil aviation laws. The directive also mandates that all inspection results be recorded on the Maintenance Release as maintenance required, and a copy of the AD must be kept in the aircraft. This directive is critical to ensuring the continued safety of flight operations involving these helicopters, given the potential risks identified in the background investigation.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Compliance Obligations
Enforcement Powers
Prohibited Conduct

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.