COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
British Aerospace BAe 125 Series Aeroplanes
AD/HS 125/80 Aileron Centre Hinge Link Bush 8/86
DM
This AD contents has been removed from the listing because the aircraft model is not currently on the register.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority, pursuant to the Civil Aviation Act 1988, introduced the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, which are designed to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation within Australia. Part 39 of these regulations pertains to airworthiness directives, which are legally enforceable rules issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority to correct an unsafe condition on an aircraft. One such directive, AD/HS 125/80, was specific to the British Aerospace BAe 125 Series Aeroplanes, focusing on the aileron centre hinge link bush. The purpose of this directive was to address safety concerns related to the specified component of these aircraft. However, as noted in the document, this particular directive has been removed from the active listing because the BAe 125 model is no longer on the Australian aircraft register. This change reflects the ongoing efforts of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority to adapt and refine its regulations to the current operational realities within Australian aviation.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under PART 39 - 105, applies to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority’s Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, which is aimed at ensuring that all aircraft operated within Australian airspace meet certain safety standards. This particular legislative instrument, AD/HS 125/80, pertains to the British Aerospace BAe 125 Series Aeroplanes, focusing on the aileron centre hinge link bush. It mandates specific safety measures and maintenance requirements for these aircraft to maintain their airworthiness. The regulation applies to all aircraft operators and maintenance personnel who work on the BAe 125 series within Australian jurisdiction. The geographic reach of this Act is national, ensuring that all operators and entities involved in the maintenance and operation of these aircraft comply with the specified safety directives. However, since the aircraft model is not currently on the register, this specific directive has been removed from the listing, indicating that it no longer applies to any active BAe 125 series aeroplanes within the Commonwealth of Australia.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, particularly in PART 39 - 105, outline the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives for specific aircraft models. Within this context, AD/HS 125/80 pertains to the British Aerospace BAe 125 Series Aeroplanes, focusing on the aileron centre hinge link bush. Despite its inclusion in the regulations, it is noted that this AD content has been removed from the listing due to the aircraft model not being currently on the register (AD/HS 125/80).
These directives are established to ensure that specific aircraft maintain their airworthiness and adhere to safety standards. The regulations mandate compliance with the issued directives for any aircraft within the scope of AD/HS 125/80, including necessary inspections, repairs, and modifications. Any owner or operator of an aircraft subject to these directives must follow the stipulated procedures to ensure ongoing compliance with safety standards (PART 39 - 105).
The obligations imposed on the parties governed by these regulations are comprehensive. Aircraft owners, operators, and maintenance personnel must ensure that the aircraft meet all specified requirements. This includes adhering to the inspection and maintenance schedules outlined in the AD/HS 125/80 directive, recording all actions taken, and maintaining documentation of compliance. Non-compliance with these directives can lead to significant operational disruptions and safety risks (PART 39 - 105).
Violating these provisions can result in substantial consequences. The regulations establish both civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance. Civil penalties may include fines, while criminal penalties can involve imprisonment. The severity of the penalties depends on the nature and extent of the breach. For example, failure to comply with mandatory inspection requirements can result in fines up to a specified maximum amount, and more severe breaches may lead to imprisonment for a defined period (PART 39 - 105). It is crucial for all parties involved to fully understand and adhere to these requirements to avoid such penalties.