CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.
The US FAA amended their regulations affecting transport category aircraft in 2003. CASA promulgated these requirements as AD/GENERAL/84. In late 2005, the FAA amended their requirements, reducing the impact on operators. As a result, CASA has amended the equivalent Australian AD to reflect the new, reduced, requirements. The amended AD, AD/GENERAL/84 Amendment 1, will become effective on 13 April 2006. This AD cancels and replaces the previous issue.
As this AD is issued because of Australia’s obligations under Convention on International Civil Aviation, and because it is issued in response to an AD raised by the relevant State of Design, no consultation of the Australian public has taken place on this AD. The Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the Manager, Airframes in the Manufacturing, Certification and New Technologies Office, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, enacted by the Australian Parliament, was established to regulate civil aviation in Australia, with a strong emphasis on ensuring the safety of air navigation. This Act grants the Governor-General the authority to create regulations that align with the Act's objectives and serve the interests of aviation safety. One such regulation is the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, under which the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has the power to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. ADs are legislative instruments and serve as a means to maintain the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types, in line with international standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).
The ADs are issued in response to Australia's obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation and are based on information provided by the aircraft's State of Design. The State of Registry, in this case CASA, is responsible for ensuring the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft on the Australian Register. This particular AD, AD/GENERAL/84 Amendment 1, was issued to reflect amendments made by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to their regulations affecting transport category aircraft. The AD cancels and replaces the previous issue and will become effective on 13 April 2006. Given the international nature of the AD and the direct response to the State of Design's AD, no public consultation has taken place, and the Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provide a legislative framework within which airworthiness directives (ADs) are issued to ensure the safety of air navigation. Specifically, under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General has the authority to make regulations, including ADs, for the safety of air navigation. Regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 further empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue ADs for specific kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products, which are considered legislative instruments under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The ADs issued by CASA are in line with international obligations under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, where the State of Design holds responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types and must provide necessary information to the States of Registry. CASA, as Australia's national airworthiness authority, must then assess this information and issue corresponding ADs as required to maintain the safety standards of aircraft registered in Australia. The application of these ADs is mandatory for all entities and individuals involved in the operation and maintenance of affected aircraft within Australia's jurisdiction.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, specifically under section 98, empowers the Governor-General to create regulations in the interest of air navigation safety. This legislative framework is instrumental in enabling the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products, as outlined in regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. It is critical to note that an AD, as stipulated in subregulation 39.001(5), is categorised as a disallowable instrument under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and thus, it is considered a legislative instrument as per section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Under these provisions, the State of Design is entrusted with the overarching responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, as per Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. This responsibility includes providing all necessary information to the States of Registry to ensure the type's continuing airworthiness. Conversely, the State of Registry, which, for Australian-registered aircraft, is CASA, must develop or adopt requisite measures to maintain airworthiness. In instances where the State of Design issues an AD for a type of aircraft registered in Australia, CASA is mandated to review this information and, if deemed necessary, issue an Australian AD to enforce the State of Design's requirements.
An example of this process in action is the recent amendment by CASA to an existing AD concerning transport category aircraft, following a similar amendment by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Initially, CASA issued AD/GENERAL/84 in response to the FAA's 2003 regulations. However, with the FAA's subsequent amendment in late 2005, reducing the impact on operators, CASA has also amended the Australian equivalent AD, now known as AD/GENERAL/84 Amendment 1. This amended AD, set to take effect on 13 April 2006, supersedes the previous AD. Given that this AD is issued in response to international obligations and a directive from the State of Design, there was no consultation with the Australian public, and the Office of Regulatory Review has determined that a Regulatory Impact Statement is not required. The AD was made by the Manager, Airframes in the Manufacturing, Certification and New Technologies Office, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A(2) of the Act.
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 impose stringent obligations on the parties governed by them. CASA, as the national airworthiness authority, must rigorously assess any AD issued by the State of Design and determine if an Australian AD is necessary. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in serious consequences. If an aircraft is found to be non-compliant with an AD, this could lead to penalties under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. Such penalties may include fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the breach. For example, under section 366 of the Act, a person who contravenes an airworthiness direction can be fined up to 10,000 penalty units or imprisoned for up to two years, or both. Additionally, CASA has the authority to suspend or revoke an aircraft’s certificate of airworthiness if it is found to be non-compliant with applicable ADs, effectively grounding the aircraft until the required actions are taken.