CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.
The German LBA issued AD D-1994-280R3, affecting MBB BK-117 helicopters, in 2005. Germany is the State of Design for this type. As a result of a request from industry, CASA has amended the equivalent Australian AD to exempt new design main rotor blades from the applicability of this AD. The amended AD, AD/GBK 117/6 Amendment 4, will become effective on 25 October 2007. This AD cancels and replaces the previous issue.
As this AD is issued because of Australia’s obligations under Convention on International Civil Aviation, and because it is issued in response to an AD raised by the relevant State of Design, no consultation of the Australian public has taken place on this AD. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the Manager, Airframes in the Airworthiness Engineering Branch, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, enacted by the Australian Parliament, serves as the foundational piece of legislation governing civil aviation in Australia. This Act was designed to provide a regulatory framework to ensure the safety and efficiency of air navigation. In line with the Act's provisions, the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 further delineate the regulatory responsibilities and mechanisms, including the issuance of airworthiness directives (ADs) by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). The ADs are mandated under regulation 39.001 and are considered legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The policy objective of these directives is to maintain and enhance the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, in accordance with international standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). This legislative framework ensures that Australia meets its obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, particularly regarding the responsibilities of the State of Design and the State of Registry in ensuring aircraft safety.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, pursuant to section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for particular kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. These ADs are legislative instruments as defined under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and are subject to disallowance under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. The ADs serve to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and are issued in alignment with Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The State of Design holds primary responsibility for the airworthiness of an aircraft type and must furnish necessary information to States of Registry, who are then responsible for the continuing airworthiness of individual aircraft within their jurisdiction. CASA, as Australia's national airworthiness authority, must evaluate the information provided by the State of Design and issue corresponding Australian ADs if appropriate. In this context, the ADs do not require consultation with the Australian public and are not subject to a Regulatory Impact Statement, as determined by the Office of Best Practice Regulation. The ADs are issued under the authority of the Act and are managed by the Manager, Airframes, in the Airworthiness Engineering Branch of CASA.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Act 1988 (section 98) empowers the Governor-General to create regulations to promote air navigation safety. Regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 grants the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) the authority to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for certain types of aircraft or aeronautical products. This process is governed by the provisions of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which stipulate that an AD is a disallowable instrument and, therefore, a legislative instrument (subsection 39.001(5)).
The State of Design, which holds overall responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, is mandated by Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation to provide necessary information to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs represent a common form of continuing airworthiness information, issued by most ICAO Contracting States. The State of Registry, which is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of an individual aircraft, must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft in line with Annex 8. When a State of Design issues an AD for a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess this information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.
There are specific obligations and requirements imposed by the Act and Regulations on the parties and entities it governs. The State of Design must ensure the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and provide necessary information to the States of Registry. The State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. CASA must assess ADs issued by States of Design and, if necessary, issue corresponding Australian ADs. The AD in question, AD/GBK 117/6 Amendment 4, was issued in response to a German AD concerning MBB BK-117 helicopters, with an effective date of 25 October 2007. Given that this AD was issued due to Australia’s obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation and in response to an AD raised by the relevant State of Design, no consultation of the Australian public has taken place on this AD, and the Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, breaches of ADs can result in significant penalties. Failure to comply with an AD can result in serious safety implications and may lead to enforcement actions by CASA. Civil penalties for non-compliance can include fines and imprisonment. For example, under section 61 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, a person who contravenes a regulation can be subject to a penalty of up to $126,000 for an individual and $630,000 for a body corporate. Additionally, the courts can impose further penalties, including injunctions and orders for the detention or destruction of non-compliant aircraft or aeronautical products. Criminal penalties may also apply, with potential imprisonment terms for serious breaches.