COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 107 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Compressed Gas Cylinders
AD/GAS/2 Filament Wound, Fibre-Glass, High Pressure Spherical Vessels
Applicability: All vessels manufactured by Apex Fibre-Glass Products, Cleveland, Ohio. Requirement: Retire from service.
Compliance: Forthwith.
3/74
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended by the Legislative instrument F2006B10227, were enacted to address safety concerns related to the use of filament wound, fibre-glass, high-pressure spherical vessels in aviation. This legislation was introduced to ensure the safety and reliability of compressed gas cylinders used in aviation, specifically targeting vessels manufactured by Apex Fibre-Glass Products, Cleveland, Ohio. The policy objective behind this directive is to mitigate potential risks associated with these vessels by mandating their retirement from service to prevent any safety hazards. The Australian Parliament, through the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, has implemented this directive to uphold stringent safety standards within the aviation industry.
The legislative instrument F2006B10227 serves as an amendment to the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, emphasising the importance of compliance with airworthiness directives to safeguard the integrity of aviation operations. By requiring the immediate retirement of the specified vessels, the regulation aims to eliminate any potential threats posed by these high-pressure spherical vessels. This measure is part of a broader effort to maintain the highest safety standards in civil aviation, ensuring the well-being of passengers and crew alike. The directive is issued under the authority of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, reflecting the commitment to rigorous safety oversight in the aviation sector.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, under the legislative instrument F2006B10227, apply to all compressed gas cylinders specifically those filament wound, fibre-glass, high pressure spherical vessels manufactured by Apex Fibre-Glass Products in Cleveland, Ohio. This regulation is enforced by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) and pertains to the maintenance and safety standards of these vessels within the Commonwealth of Australia. The directive mandates that all affected vessels must be retired from service immediately, ensuring that the safety and operational standards set forth by CASA are upheld. This regulation does not specify exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds but relies on subordinate instruments to extend or restrict its application as necessary.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, particularly under Part 39, specify the requirements for the airworthiness of compressed gas cylinders, with a particular focus on filament wound, fibre-glass, high-pressure spherical vessels manufactured by Apex Fibre-Glass Products in Cleveland, Ohio. The directive AD/GAS/2 mandates that all such vessels must be retired from service (Section 3/74). This requirement is absolute and must be complied with immediately upon the issuance of the directive.
Entities governed by this regulation must ensure that any compressed gas cylinders manufactured by Apex Fibre-Glass Products are removed from service without delay. This obligation is not only to prevent potential safety hazards but also to maintain compliance with the stringent safety standards set forth by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. Failure to comply with this directive can result in serious ramifications for the operators and owners of these vessels.
In terms of legal consequences, any breach of this directive can lead to severe penalties. The specific penalties for non-compliance are not detailed in the given extract, but generally, the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 allow for both civil and criminal sanctions. Civil penalties may include fines, while criminal penalties could result in imprisonment, depending on the severity and intent behind the non-compliance. The exact penalties would be determined based on the specific breach and the regulatory framework governing such violations.