CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.
CASA recently raised AD/GA8/3 to correct an unsafe situation on Gippsland Aeronautics GA-8 Airvan aircraft. Service experience has shown that the forward slide on the GA-8’s cargo door is prone to excessive wear. Such wear could lead to the cargo door becoming detached and hitting the horizontal stabiliser, rendering the aircraft uncontrollable. As Australia is the State of Design for the GA-8, CASA is required to develop, and to transmit to other States of Registry, an AD to correct the problem. Now, as a result of a request from an Australian operator, CASA has amended this AD to extend the period between repetitive inspections to allow operators to align the work required by the AD with other, routine, maintenance.
CASA has not consulted with the Australian industry and public because the change to the AD relieves the burden on operators.
The Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the General Manager, Manufacturing, Certification and New Technologies Office, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Act 1988 was enacted to provide a comprehensive legal framework for civil aviation in Australia, ensuring the safety and efficiency of air navigation. This Act allows the Governor-General to make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 further support this objective by empowering the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. This regulatory mechanism ensures that Australia adheres to international standards set by the Convention on International Civil Aviation, particularly under Annex 8, which mandates that the State of Design is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type. CASA, as the national airworthiness authority, must assess any information provided by the State of Design and, if necessary, issue an Australian AD to enforce these requirements. This process was exemplified in the recent amendment to AD/GA8/3 concerning the Gippsland Aeronautics GA-8 Airvan aircraft, where CASA extended the inspection period to alleviate the operational burden on Australian operators.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, as supplemented by the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These directives are legislative instruments, subject to disallowance and oversight, and are intended to ensure the ongoing safety of aircraft in operation. The authority to issue ADs is derived from the need for continuing airworthiness as mandated by international standards, particularly those set out in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. In practice, the State of Design, such as Australia for the Gippsland Aeronautics GA-8 Airvan, has the responsibility to issue ADs for aircraft types under its purview, and CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must then assess and, if necessary, issue corresponding ADs for aircraft registered in Australia. This regulatory framework ensures that the safety standards set by the State of Design are implemented and maintained across all States of Registry. The issuance and amendment of ADs by CASA are intended to address safety issues and are not subject to mandatory consultation with industry or the public unless otherwise required by specific legislative mandates or administrative processes.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, under regulation 39.001, grant the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) the authority to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for certain kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products (39.001(1)). An AD is a legislative instrument, as outlined in subregulation 39.001(5) and defined by section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. These directives are essential tools for ensuring the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types, as stipulated under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The State of Design, which is Australia for the Gippsland Aeronautics GA-8 Airvan, has the overarching responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft type and must provide necessary information to the State of Registry. In this case, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess this information and, if necessary, issue an Australian AD to enforce the requirements set forth by the State of Design.
Under the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA must develop and issue ADs to address any unsafe conditions identified with specific types of aircraft. This process involves CASA evaluating the information provided by the State of Design, which in this instance is Australia for the Gippsland Aeronautics GA-8 Airvan. If an unsafe situation is identified, such as the excessive wear on the cargo door slide of the GA-8, CASA is required to issue an AD to mandate corrective actions. In response to a request from an Australian operator, CASA has amended AD/GA8/3 to extend the period between repetitive inspections, allowing operators to better align the AD requirements with routine maintenance schedules.
The obligations imposed by the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 on CASA include the responsibility to issue ADs to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft on the Australian Register. CASA must thoroughly assess any information provided by the State of Design and implement the necessary ADs to mitigate identified risks. For the Gippsland Aeronautics GA-8 Airvan, CASA's obligation was to issue an AD to address the unsafe condition of the cargo door slide wear, which could potentially lead to the cargo door detaching and hitting the horizontal stabiliser, rendering the aircraft uncontrollable. Furthermore, CASA has the obligation to communicate these ADs to other States of Registry and ensure compliance with international standards set by Annex 8 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation.
In terms of civil and criminal consequences, the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 do not explicitly state penalties for non-compliance with ADs. However, under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, failure to comply with an AD could be considered a breach of airworthiness requirements, leading to potential civil penalties, including fines. Moreover, if such non-compliance results in an accident or incident, the penalties could be more severe, potentially including criminal charges. CASA's enforcement of ADs is critical in maintaining the safety standards required by international and Australian aviation regulations, and non-compliance could result in significant repercussions for the aircraft operators and manufacturers involved.