CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.
CASA has raised AD/G164/5 Amendment 2 to include terminating action in respect of Schweizer (Grumman) G-164 (Ag-Cat) series aircraft. Terminating action was not included in AD/G164/5 (raised in 1966) which was later provided by State of design directive FAA AD 73-19-10. As there are some examples of the G-164 (Ag-Cat) on the Australian register CASA has developed an amendment to reflect the requirements of the State of design to assist aircraft operators by the provision of a terminating action. This AD cancels and replaces the previous issue. CASA has not consulted with the Australian industry and public as there are no safety issues raised by this amendment.
The Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the Manager, Initial Airworthiness, Airworthiness and Engineering Branch, in the Standards Development and Future Technology Division, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.