AD/FA-200/6 - Superseded by AD/FA-200/10

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B09941 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 


Fuji FA-200 Series Aeroplanes

 

AD/FA-200/6 Superseded by AD/FA-200/10 NK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended, constitute the foundational framework governing civil aviation safety in Australia. Specifically, Part 39 - 105 within this regulation, addresses airworthiness directives concerning various aircraft, including the Fuji FA-200 Series Aeroplanes. This part was enacted by the Australian Parliament to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation operations through the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). The overarching policy objective is to mandate the maintenance and inspection of aircraft to prevent accidents and incidents, thereby safeguarding public safety. The regulations, through their structured directives, aim to fill any gaps in aircraft safety standards and ensure compliance with international benchmarks.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, specifically AD/FA-200/6 concerning the Fuji FA-200 Series Aeroplanes, applies to all operators of Fuji FA-200 Series aircraft within the Commonwealth of Australia. This legislative instrument mandates compliance with the stipulated airworthiness directives to ensure the safety and proper maintenance of these aircraft. The regulations apply to both individuals and entities operating these aircraft, and cover all phases of flight operations, maintenance activities, and related transactions. This directive operates under the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth and applies nationwide, ensuring a uniform standard of safety across the aviation sector in Australia. While AD/FA-200/6 has been superseded by AD/FA-200/10, the superseded directive remains relevant for operators who have not yet transitioned to the new requirements. Notably, the applicability of these directives can be extended or modified through subordinate instruments issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105 Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, includes provisions concerning the Fuji FA-200 Series Aeroplanes. Section AD/FA-200/6, though superseded by AD/FA-200/10, outlines requirements for ensuring the airworthiness of these aircraft. The main operative sections (AD/FA-200/6) mandate compliance with specific maintenance and inspection protocols to ensure the safety of the aircraft. This includes regular checks of the aircraft’s airframe, engines, and avionics systems to prevent potential failures and ensure continued safe operation. The obligations imposed by these regulations are significant and encompass both the aircraft owners and operators. Owners and operators of Fuji FA-200 Series Aeroplanes must adhere to the maintenance schedules and inspection protocols outlined in the airworthiness directives. This includes conducting mandatory inspections at specified intervals and ensuring any identified issues are addressed promptly and effectively. Additionally, the regulations require the maintenance records to be meticulously kept and made available for inspection by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) upon request. Breach of these regulations can result in serious consequences. The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 impose penalties for non-compliance, which can include fines and, in severe cases, the grounding of the aircraft until compliance is achieved. For example, if an operator fails to conduct a required inspection or does not address identified issues in a timely manner, CASA may issue a Notice of Unauthorized Operation (NOUO) or a Notice of Unauthorized Change (NOC). In more serious cases, such as those involving a significant safety hazard, the penalties can be more severe, including potential criminal charges against the responsible parties. The maximum penalties for non-compliance with these airworthiness directives can include substantial fines and imprisonment for individuals, reflecting the gravity of ensuring safe aviation practices.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Compliance Obligations
Enforcement Powers
Catchwords
Airworthiness Directives

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.