CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority or its predecessors issued AD/ENST 28/19 affecting Enstrom F-28 series helicopters. CASA has assessed this AD and as a result has cancelled Australian AD/ENST 28/19. The cancellation will become effective on 27 August 2009. No replacement AD is required, as the unsafe condition no longer exists.
As this AD has been cancelled because of Australia’s obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, no consultation with the Australian public has taken place on this AD cancellation. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the Manager, Future Technology and Regulatory Trends, in the Standards Development and Future Technology Division, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Act 1988 was enacted to provide a legal framework for the regulation of civil aviation in Australia, with a primary focus on ensuring the safety of air navigation. This Act empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under the authority granted by this Act, the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 were established, enabling the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These ADs, which are legislative instruments under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, play a crucial role in maintaining the continuing airworthiness of aircraft in accordance with international standards set by the Convention on International Civil Aviation.
In line with its responsibilities under Annex 8 of the Convention, Australia's national airworthiness authority, CASA, must assess and, if necessary, issue Australian ADs in response to ADs issued by the State of Design. This process ensures that Australian aircraft meet international safety standards. In a specific instance, CASA cancelled the Australian AD/ENST 28/19 for the Enstrom F-28 series helicopters, effective from 27 August 2009, due to the resolution of the unsafe condition that prompted its issuance. This action was taken in accordance with Australia’s obligations under the Convention, without the need for public consultation or a Regulatory Impact Statement, and was authorised by the Manager, Future Technology and Regulatory Trends, in CASA's Standards Development and Future Technology Division.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, in conjunction with the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, establishes the legal framework for the issuance of airworthiness directives (ADs) in Australia. These regulations apply to all entities involved in civil aviation, including aircraft manufacturers, operators, and maintenance organisations. The ADs are designed to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, and are mandated by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). The scope of these directives extends to all aircraft registered in Australia, regardless of whether they are domestically or internationally operated. The ADs are aligned with the requirements of Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which designates the State of Design as responsible for the airworthiness of aircraft types and the State of Registry as responsible for the continuing airworthiness of individual aircraft. In cases where CASA issues an AD, it must align with the international standards and requirements set forth by the State of Design. The issuance and cancellation of ADs are legislative instruments, and their implementation is overseen by CASA, which operates under the authority granted by the Civil Aviation Act 1988.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this legislation, specifically under the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, provide the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) with the authority to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) (reg. 39.001). These directives, as defined in subreg. 39.001(5), are legislative instruments that play a crucial role in ensuring the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, particularly when issued by the State of Design (Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation). The ADs are instrumental in providing necessary information for maintaining safety standards and are typically issued by most International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Contracting States. In the case of Australia, CASA, as the national airworthiness authority, has the responsibility to assess any ADs issued by the State of Design and, if necessary, issue corresponding Australian ADs to enforce the required safety measures.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act and the accompanying regulations on parties and entities governed by these provisions are substantial. CASA, as the national airworthiness authority, must rigorously evaluate any ADs issued by the State of Design concerning aircraft on the Australian Register. This evaluation process ensures that CASA can determine whether an Australian AD is necessary to mandate the safety requirements outlined by the State of Design. Furthermore, the State of Registry of an individual aircraft holds the responsibility for ensuring the continuing airworthiness of that aircraft, in alignment with the obligations outlined in Annex 8 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation. This includes developing or adopting appropriate requirements and procedures to maintain the safety standards of aircraft registered within their jurisdiction.
The legislation also delineates the consequences of non-compliance with the provisions outlined. While specific offences and penalties are not detailed within the text, it is clear that failure to adhere to the requirements of airworthiness directives could lead to significant safety risks. CASA’s authority to issue ADs is underpinned by the need to ensure compliance with international safety standards, and any breach of these regulations could result in civil or criminal consequences. The exact nature and severity of these penalties would be determined by the specific circumstances of non-compliance and the subsequent legal proceedings. However, the overarching principle is that the maintenance of airworthiness and adherence to safety directives is paramount to ensuring the safety of air navigation.
The cancellation of AD/ENST 28/19, affecting Enstrom F-28 series helicopters, highlights the dynamic nature of airworthiness directives. CASA has determined that the unsafe condition previously identified no longer exists, leading to the cancellation of the directive. This decision was made in accordance with Australia’s obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation and did not necessitate public consultation or the preparation of a Regulatory Impact Statement, as determined by the Office of Best Practice Regulation. The AD was issued by the Manager, Future Technology and Regulatory Trends, in the Standards Development and Future Technology Division, on behalf of CASA, under subsection 84A(2) of the Act. This cancellation, effective from 27 August 2009, underscores CASA’s commitment to continuously monitor and address safety issues related to aircraft airworthiness.