COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 107 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Emergency Equipment
AD/EMY/21 | Life Jackets (RFD) - Inspection | 9/84 |
Applicability: | All RFD life jackets type 80 MK2, type 80 MK2BA and type 1001. | |
Requirement: | Accomplish one of the following:- | |
- (a) Inspect for discolouration, brittleness to touch or porosity; and
(b) Pressure test - inflate life jacket with clean dry air to 3 P.S.I. No loss of pressure is permitted over one minute. Inflate to 300mm water gauge. Max loss permitted, 20mm over five minutes.
2. Test in accordance with a scheme acceptable to the Secretary.
3. Return life jacket to RFD service agent for inspection and test.
Note: Major defect reports must be submitted detailing serial number of defective life jacket and the nature of the deterioration.
Compliance: Unless already accomplished within the last six months, before 30 November 1984.
Background: This Directive is issued to ensure the integrity of life jackets made from material specification DTI-MS3/14/0446 by Bramac Industries.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Commonwealth of Australia, provide comprehensive safety standards and directives for the aviation industry. One such directive, AD/EMY/21, pertains specifically to the inspection of life jackets used on certain aircraft. This directive was introduced to address the need for stringent checks on the integrity of life jackets made from specific materials to ensure passenger safety in emergency situations. The policy objective is to prevent deterioration or damage that could compromise the effectiveness of life jackets in an emergency, thereby safeguarding the lives of passengers. The directive mandates that all RFD life jackets of certain types be inspected for physical and pressure integrity, with compliance required within a specified timeframe. Compliance with these regulations is essential for maintaining high safety standards in civil aviation.
The enforcement of these regulations falls under the purview of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, which is tasked with ensuring that all aviation safety directives are adhered to. The directive mandates a series of specific actions for inspecting and testing life jackets, including visual inspections for physical defects and pressure tests to ensure they maintain their structural integrity. This directive underscores the importance of regular maintenance and checks on critical safety equipment, highlighting the commitment of the Australian government to prioritise passenger safety in the aviation sector.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 107, applies to the safety of emergency equipment used in civil aviation within Australia, including all aircraft registered in the country and their operations. This legislation mandates that all RFD life jackets types 80 MK2, 80 MK2BA, and 1001 must undergo rigorous inspection procedures to ensure their integrity and functionality. The regulations require that life jackets be inspected for any signs of discolouration, brittleness, or porosity, and must also pass a pressure test that involves inflating the life jacket to specific pressures with no permitted loss over a given time. Additionally, compliance with the regulations necessitates that these inspections occur within set timeframes unless already completed within the last six months, and requires the submission of major defect reports detailing the nature of any deterioration found. The directive is enforceable across all Commonwealth territories and applies to all relevant aircraft and their operators, with no specified exclusions or exemptions outlined in this particular directive.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under PART 39 - 107 and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives (AD/EMY/21), outline critical procedures for the inspection and testing of RFD life jackets. These directives apply to all RFD life jackets types 80 MK2, 80 MK2BA, and 1001 (section 1). The primary requirement is that these life jackets must be inspected for discolouration, brittleness to touch, and porosity (section 1(a)). Additionally, a pressure test is mandated: the life jacket should be inflated with clean dry air to 3 PSI with no loss of pressure over one minute and then inflated to 300mm water gauge with a maximum loss of 20mm over five minutes (section 1(b)). These inspections can either be conducted in accordance with a scheme acceptable to the Secretary or by returning the life jacket to an RFD service agent for professional inspection and testing (section 1(2) and (3)). Compliance with these directives is mandatory unless the life jackets have already undergone inspection within the last six months before 30 November 1984 (section 4).
The obligations imposed by these regulations are clear and specific. Operators of aircraft equipped with RFD life jackets of the specified types must ensure that these inspections and tests are carried out either by their own qualified personnel following an approved testing scheme or by a certified RFD service agent. This ensures the safety and integrity of the life jackets, which are critical in emergency situations. Additionally, any major defects identified during the inspection must be reported to the appropriate authorities, detailing the serial number of the defective life jacket and the nature of the deterioration (section 5). This requirement is aimed at maintaining a high standard of airworthiness and safety for all aviation operations.
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 establish serious consequences for non-compliance with the AD/EMY/21 directives. Failure to inspect and test the life jackets as required can result in significant penalties. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the excerpt, non-compliance with airworthiness directives generally carries severe civil and potentially criminal penalties under Australian aviation law. These penalties can include fines and potential grounding of aircraft, which could severely impact an operator’s ability to conduct business. Additionally, any accidents or incidents arising from the failure to comply with these directives could lead to further legal repercussions, including prosecution under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. Ensuring adherence to these regulations is therefore not only a legal requirement but also a crucial aspect of maintaining operational safety and reliability in aviation.