COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Eurocopter AS 350 (Ecureuil) Series Helicopters
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
AD/ECUREUIL/60 “NR” Indicator Lighting 3/2000
Applicability: AS 350 B3 version helicopters, which do not incorporate MOD 072810 or any other approved modification, enabling full “NR” indicator lighting in the normal and emergency modes.
Requirement: Install a lighting strip (eyebrow lights) on the “NR” indicator in accordance with Eurocopter AS 350 Mandatory Service Bulletin 33.00.17.
Note: DGAC AD 1999-512-077(A) refers.
Compliance: Before 30 April 2000.
This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 23 March 2000.
Background: This Directive ensures that the “NR” indicator is illuminated in both the normal and emergency modes.
Eugene Paul Holzapfel
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 10 February 2000
The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 23 February 2000.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39, addresses the need for ensuring the safety of aircraft through the issuance of Airworthiness Directives (ADs). Enacted by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under the authority granted by the Civil Aviation Act 1988, these regulations aim to mitigate risks and maintain the airworthiness of aircraft operating within Australia. The problem or gap this legislation seeks to address is the assurance of compliance with safety standards through mandatory directives, which are essential to prevent unsafe conditions in aviation operations. The policy objective is to protect public safety and maintain high standards in civil aviation by ensuring that all aircraft meet necessary safety requirements.
One such example is Airworthiness Directive AD/ECUREUIL/60, issued to address the illumination of the "NR" indicator on AS 350 B3 version helicopters. The directive mandates the installation of a lighting strip to ensure the "NR" indicator is illuminated in both normal and emergency modes, as specified in Eurocopter's Mandatory Service Bulletin 33.00.17. This directive became effective on 23 March 2000, and required compliance by 30 April 2000. This specific AD was introduced to rectify a safety concern identified by CASA, ensuring that all affected aircraft meet the required safety standards to avoid potential hazards during operation.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39, governs the safety standards and requirements for airworthiness directives in Australia, as overseen by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). Under this regulation, CASA issues specific directives to address identified safety issues with particular aircraft models. In this instance, the Airworthiness Directive AD/ECUREUIL/60 pertains to the Eurocopter AS 350 (Ecureuil) Series Helicopters, particularly those of the AS 350 B3 version that do not have modification 072810 or an equivalent approved modification for full “NR” indicator lighting in both normal and emergency modes. The directive mandates the installation of a lighting strip on the “NR” indicator in compliance with Eurocopter's service bulletin 33.00.17 to rectify this safety concern. The directive applies to all relevant helicopters within the specified conditions and requires compliance by 30 April 2000, following its effective date of 23 March 2000. This directive is applicable nationally within the Commonwealth of Australia and is applicable to aircraft operators who must ensure their fleets meet the stipulated safety requirements.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, under Part 39 - 105, include a specific Airworthiness Directive (AD) concerning the Eurocopter AS 350 (Ecureuil) Series Helicopters. This particular AD, identified as AD/ECUREUIL/60, addresses the issue of the "NR" indicator lighting (section 3/2000). The AD applies to AS 350 B3 version helicopters that do not have modification 072810 or any other approved modification that ensures full "NR" indicator lighting in both normal and emergency modes. The requirement outlined in the directive is to install a lighting strip, referred to as "eyebrow lights", on the "NR" indicator in accordance with Eurocopter AS 350 Mandatory Service Bulletin 33.00.17. This directive references DGAC AD 1999-512-077(A) and mandates compliance before 30 April 2000. The directive became effective on 23 March 2000 and was issued by Eugene Paul Holzapfel, a delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority.
The obligations imposed by this AD on the relevant parties include ensuring that the specified helicopters are modified to include the "eyebrow lights" on the "NR" indicator. This modification is intended to enhance safety by ensuring that the "NR" indicator is adequately illuminated in both normal and emergency modes. Operators of the affected helicopters must adhere to the timeline specified in the compliance section and ensure the modifications are completed by the stipulated date. Failure to comply with the directive could result in the helicopter being deemed non-airworthy, which could prevent it from operating legally.
The AD also outlines the consequences for non-compliance. While the specific penalties are not detailed within the text of the directive itself, non-compliance with Airworthiness Directives generally can result in significant penalties under civil aviation law. These may include fines, grounding of the aircraft, and potential prosecution. The severity of the penalties could vary depending on the nature and extent of the non-compliance. Additionally, there may be operational ramifications, such as the inability to obtain insurance or certification for the aircraft, further incentivising compliance with the directive.