COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Eurocopter AS 350 (Ecureuil) Series Helicopters
AD/ECUREUIL/12
Amdt 3
Applicability: All models.
Tail Rotor Blade Pitch Horn 5/87
Requirement: Action in accordance with Aerospatiale AS 350 Telex Service 01.07B. Compliance: As detailed in the requirement document.
Note: This inspection may be accomplished by the pilot-in-command, in which case the precise AD reference shall be entered in a certification made on the Maintenance Release coincident with that for the daily inspection.
Background: The manufacturer has introduced a retirement life for the subject tail rotor pitch horns. Amendment 3 changes the Compliance statement regarding certification of the inspection.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Australian Parliament, serve to regulate the safety standards within the civil aviation industry. This legislation includes specific safety directives to ensure aircraft are maintained to a high standard of airworthiness. One such directive is found in PART 39 - 105, concerning Airworthiness Directives for specific aircraft models. For instance, Amendment 3 to Airworthiness Directive AD/ECUREUIL/12 addresses the inspection and compliance requirements for the tail rotor blade pitch horns on Eurocopter AS 350 (Ecureuil) Series Helicopters. This amendment was introduced to address the manufacturer's specification for the retirement life of these components, aiming to maintain safety and reliability in flight operations. Compliance with these directives is mandatory and overseen by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, ensuring adherence to the specified requirements for continued airworthiness.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, applies to all Eurocopter AS 350 (Ecureuil) Series Helicopters and mandates adherence to the Airworthiness Directives. These directives are essential for ensuring the safe operation of these aircraft and require compliance with Aerospatiale AS 350 Telex Service 01.07B, particularly focusing on the tail rotor blade pitch horn. The directive is applicable to all models of the Eurocopter AS 350 series, mandating that the inspection of the tail rotor blade pitch horn be conducted in accordance with the specified requirements. This inspection may be performed by the pilot-in-command, and in such cases, the precise Airworthiness Directive reference must be documented in the certification made on the Maintenance Release. This regulation ensures that the specified components are regularly inspected and maintained to meet safety standards, thereby enhancing the overall safety of civil aviation operations within Australia.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically AD/ECUREUIL/12 Amendment 3, pertain to the inspection and certification of the tail rotor blade pitch horns on Eurocopter AS 350 (Ecureuil) series helicopters. Section (5/87) specifies the requirement to follow the Aerospatiale AS 350 Telex Service 01.07B for compliance, which includes details on the inspection process and the necessary actions to be taken. The requirement document outlines the specific steps and procedures to be adhered to for this inspection. Additionally, the amendment allows for the pilot-in-command to perform this inspection, provided that the precise AD reference is entered in the certification on the Maintenance Release document.
The Act imposes specific obligations on the parties involved, primarily focusing on compliance with the manufacturer's requirements and timely certification. Operators and maintenance personnel must ensure that the inspection of the tail rotor blade pitch horns is conducted as per the specified guidelines in Aerospatiale AS 350 Telex Service 01.07B. If the pilot-in-command performs the inspection, they must also ensure that the AD reference is accurately documented in the Maintenance Release certification. This dual requirement ensures that both the inspection and the certification process are meticulously followed to maintain the airworthiness of the aircraft.
Failure to comply with the provisions outlined in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 could result in serious consequences. Non-compliance with the specified inspection and certification procedures could potentially lead to safety issues and compromise the airworthiness of the helicopter. While the regulations do not explicitly state specific penalties, non-compliance could result in enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), which may include fines, enforcement notices, or more severe actions such as grounding of the aircraft until compliance is achieved. Additionally, non-compliance could lead to criminal charges if it is determined that the failure to comply has resulted in endangering the safety of the flight.