COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Eurocopter EC 120 Series Helicopters
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
AD/EC 120/5 Rotor Flight Controls 11/2001 DM
Applicability: Model EC 120 B helicopters, serial number 1001 through 1029.
Requirement: 1. Check the attachment of the bolted assembly of the torque tube in accordance with paragraph 2.B.1 of Eurocopter EC 120 Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 67A003.
If the aircraft is equipped with a torque tube with double locking, no further action is required.
2. If the aircraft is equipped with a torque tube with single locking:
- Check the security of the bolted assembly of the torque tube in accordance with paragraph 2.B.2 of ASB 67A003; and,
b. Modify the torque tube attachments in accordance with paragraph 2.B.3 of ASB 67A003.
Note: DGAC AD 2001-373-008(A) refers.
Compliance: 1. Within 50 hours time in service after 5 September 2001.
2.a. Within 50 hours time in service after Requirement 1 compliance, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 50 hours time in service until compliance with Requirement 2.b.
2.b. At the next 500-hour or 24 month inspection after 5 September 2001, whichever occurs later.
This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 5 September 2001.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Background: The manufacturer determined that some EC 120 helicopters do not have double locking of the attachment pins of the cyclic pitch stick yokes of the torque tube.
David Alan Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 30 August 2001
The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 5 September 2001.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, established by the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, aim to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation operations. As part of this overarching legislative framework, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) issues Airworthiness Directives to address specific safety concerns. The directive F2006B09311, issued under the authority of CASA, targets the Eurocopter EC 120 Series helicopters, specifically addressing an unsafe condition identified in the torque tube attachments of certain models. The directive mandates specific checks and modifications to ensure that the aircraft meet safety standards, thereby preventing potential risks associated with improper attachment of the torque tube. The objective of this directive is to enhance the operational safety of the affected helicopters by ensuring that the bolted assembly of the torque tube is secure, thereby mitigating the risk of in-flight failures.
Scope and Application
This Airworthiness Directive issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 applies to Eurocopter EC 120 B helicopters with serial numbers 1001 through 1029. It mandates specific actions to ensure the airworthiness of these aircraft, particularly concerning the rotor flight controls. The directive requires that the attachment of the bolted assembly of the torque tube be checked, and if the aircraft is equipped with a single locking torque tube, the security of the bolted assembly must be verified and the torque tube attachments modified accordingly. The actions must be taken within specified time frames, ensuring that the checks and modifications are completed at prescribed intervals. This directive, effective from 5 September 2001, is binding on the relevant helicopter operators and must be strictly adhered to as outlined in the requirements and compliance sections of the directive.
Key Provisions
The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under section 39.1 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically AD/EC 120/5, pertains to the rotor flight controls of Eurocopter EC 120 series helicopters, more precisely those with serial numbers ranging from 1001 to 1029. The directive requires that certain checks and modifications be performed on the torque tube attachments of these helicopters. For aircraft equipped with a torque tube featuring double locking, no action is required. However, if the aircraft is equipped with a torque tube with single locking, the security of the bolted assembly must be checked and, if necessary, the attachments must be modified. These actions are outlined in detail in paragraphs 2.B.1, 2.B.2, and 2.B.3 of Eurocopter EC 120 Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 67A003, with reference to DGAC AD 2001-373-008(A).
The obligations under this AD are clear and time-bound. The initial compliance must occur within 50 hours of time in service after the AD's effective date, which is 5 September 2001. Further checks must be carried out within 50 hours of time in service following the initial compliance and must continue at intervals not exceeding 50 hours until the specified modifications are completed. The final modifications must be completed by the next 500-hour or 24-month inspection after the AD's effective date, whichever comes later. These obligations are aimed at ensuring the safety of the aircraft by addressing potential issues with the torque tube attachments.
Failure to comply with the requirements of this AD may result in significant legal consequences. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is the regulatory body responsible for enforcing the AD. Any non-compliance could lead to civil penalties, such as fines, and may also result in criminal charges if the non-compliance is deemed to have caused an unsafe condition that led to an accident or incident. The exact penalties are not specified in the text, but they can be severe given the potential safety implications of the non-compliance.