AD/DHE/24 - Minimum Modification Standard at Major Reconditioning

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B09274 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 106 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 


De Havilland Piston Engines

 

AD/DHE/24 Minimum Modification Standard at Major Reconditioning

Applicability: Gipsy Six 1 and 1A, and Gipsy Six 11.


6/72

 

Document: R. Royce Gipsy TNS G No. 15 dated 18 February 1970 and Appendix 2 dated 27 June 1963.

 

Compliance: Before installation in an aircraft following next reconditioning completed after 30 June 1972.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended, contain provisions aimed at ensuring the safety and efficiency of civil aviation in Australia. This legislation, enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, addresses the need to maintain high safety standards for aircraft and their components, including engines. One specific legislative instrument under this broader regulation is F2006B09274, which pertains to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, focusing on the maintenance and modification standards for certain De Havilland piston engines, namely the Gipsy Six 1, 1A, and 11.6/72. The objective of this directive is to ensure that these engines meet the minimum modification standards at major reconditioning, thereby maintaining the safety and reliability of the aircraft they power.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, under Part 39 - 106, pertain to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, specifically focusing on De Havilland Piston Engines. This legislation applies to Gipsy Six 1 and 1A, and Gipsy Six 11.6/72 engines, ensuring they meet a minimum modification standard at major reconditioning. The applicability extends to any aircraft equipped with these engines, requiring compliance with the directive before installation following the next reconditioning completed after 30 June 1972. The regulations are underpinned by the document titled "R. Royce Gipsy TNS G No. 15 dated 18 February 1970 and Appendix 2 dated 27 June 1963," which sets the technical requirements for these engines. This legislation operates under the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring that the standards set forth are uniformly applied across the national aviation industry.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 106, outlines the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives. Of particular relevance here is AD/DHE/24, which sets out the minimum modification standard required for the major reconditioning of De Havilland Gipsy Six 1 and 1A, and Gipsy Six 11.6/72 piston engines (section 39-106). This directive mandates compliance with the technical specifications found in the document titled "R. Royce Gipsy TNS G No. 15" dated 18 February 1970, and its Appendix 2 dated 27 June 1963. Compliance with these standards is essential before these engines can be installed in an aircraft following their next reconditioning process, provided that the reconditioning is completed after 30 June 1972. The obligations imposed by AD/DHE/24 on the parties involved, particularly engine manufacturers, repair facilities, and aircraft operators, are clear and specific. Manufacturers and repair facilities must ensure that the reconditioning of the specified De Havilland Gipsy engines adheres to the detailed technical requirements outlined in the referenced documents. This includes any modifications, inspections, and tests necessary to meet the minimum standards. Aircraft operators, on the other hand, must ensure that any reconditioned engines installed in their aircraft comply with these airworthiness directives. This involves verifying that the reconditioning process was carried out in accordance with the stipulated standards and documentation. Failure to comply with AD/DHE/24 can result in significant consequences, both civil and criminal. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, non-compliance can lead to enforcement actions by CASA, which may include fines, suspension or revocation of airworthiness certificates, and other regulatory penalties. The maximum penalties for serious breaches can be substantial, reflecting the critical nature of airworthiness standards in ensuring public safety. Additionally, in cases where non-compliance leads to accidents or incidents, it can also result in criminal charges, including potential imprisonment for individuals responsible for the oversight or execution of the reconditioning processes. It is imperative for all parties involved to strictly adhere to these regulations to avoid such severe repercussions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Compliance Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.