COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
DHC-3 (Otter) Series Aeroplanes
AD/DHC-3/6 Rudder Control NK
Applicability: As detailed in Requirement Document.
Requirement: Action in accordance with De H Canada EB “O” Nos 1 and 3.
Note: Canadian AD 55-3 refers.
Compliance: Forthwith.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), were enacted to provide comprehensive regulations governing civil aviation in Australia, ensuring safety, efficiency, and national security in the air transport industry. One of the key legislative instruments under these regulations is the DHC-3 (Otter) Series Aeroplanes Airworthiness Directive AD/DHC-3/6, which pertains specifically to rudder control. This directive was introduced to address safety concerns and ensure compliance with international standards regarding the maintenance and operation of DHC-3 aircraft. The policy objective is to enhance the safety of civil aviation by mandating specific actions and compliance measures, as outlined in the directive, to be carried out immediately to prevent potential hazards. The regulations are enforced by the Australian Parliament to maintain the highest standards of aviation safety across the nation.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 – 105, applies to the maintenance and operational standards of aircraft within Australia, including the DHC-3 (Otter) Series Aeroplanes. This particular regulation mandates compliance with Airworthiness Directives issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. The scope of this directive includes all operators of DHC-3 aircraft within Australia, ensuring that maintenance and operational standards are adhered to in accordance with the specified De H Canada EB “O” Nos 1 and 3. It references Canadian AD 55-3 for further guidance, and compliance is required forthwith, underscoring the urgency and critical nature of the directive for maintaining airworthiness. The regulation applies nationally across the Commonwealth of Australia and is enforceable by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, with no stated exclusions or exemptions in the provided text. The applicability and specific requirements can be further detailed in the accompanying Requirement Document and subordinate instruments.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, particularly under Part 39, Section 105, establishes the Schedule of Airworthiness Directives for DHC-3 (Otter) series aeroplanes. The specific directive AD/DHC-3/6 pertains to the rudder control of these aircraft. The applicability of this directive is detailed in the Requirement Document, which outlines the specific circumstances or conditions under which the directive must be followed (Section 105). The requirement for compliance with this directive is that it must be carried out in accordance with De H Canada EB “O” Nos 1 and 3, with reference to Canadian AD 55-3 (Section 105).
The obligations imposed by this directive are clear and immediate. Operators and owners of DHC-3 series aeroplanes must ensure that the rudder control systems are inspected and serviced or replaced as necessary to meet the specifications outlined in the referenced documents. This ensures that the rudder control systems are safe and functional, thereby maintaining the airworthiness of the aircraft. Compliance must be achieved forthwith, which means that operators must act promptly to address any issues identified under the directive (Section 105).
Failure to comply with the provisions of this directive can result in severe consequences. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) can take action against operators and owners who do not adhere to the requirements set out in the directive. The specific penalties and consequences for non-compliance may include fines, suspension or revocation of aircraft operating certificates, and potential criminal charges. The exact penalties can vary based on the severity of the non-compliance and the discretion of CASA. However, the potential for significant financial and operational repercussions underscores the importance of strict adherence to the directive (Section 105).