COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
DHC-3 (Otter) Series Aeroplanes
AD/DHC-3/25 Wing Strut and Attachments - Retirement Lives 11/69
Applicability: All models.
Requirement: Action in accordance with De H Canada SB No 3/10. Compliance: As detailed in Requirement Document.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended by the legislative instrument F2006B09074, aim to address safety concerns associated with the DHC-3 (Otter) Series aeroplanes. Enacted by the Australian Parliament, this regulation specifically targets the wing strut and its attachments, providing clear directives to ensure the aircraft's continued airworthiness. The policy objective of this legislative instrument is to mandate the retirement of the wing strut and attachments in compliance with de Havilland Canada Service Bulletin No. 3/10, ensuring that all models of the DHC-3 series meet stringent safety standards. This directive was introduced to mitigate risks and maintain the safety integrity of civil aviation operations within Australia.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, addresses the airworthiness directives related to the DHC-3 (Otter) Series Aeroplanes, with a focus on the AD/DHC-3/25 concerning the wing strut and attachments. This legislation applies to all models of the DHC-3 (Otter) Series aeroplanes, ensuring that the aircraft remain in a safe condition for operation. The applicability extends to all entities and persons involved in the operation, maintenance, and oversight of these aircraft within the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth of Australia. The regulation mandates compliance with De H Canada SB No 3/10, providing detailed actions that must be taken in accordance with the specified requirement document. The regulations are enforced by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) and are applicable nationally across all states and territories of Australia, ensuring uniform standards and safety protocols are maintained across the aviation industry. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds specified in this particular legislative instrument; however, the application and enforcement may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments as deemed necessary by CASA.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, includes the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's Schedule of Airworthiness Directives for DHC-3 (Otter) Series Aeroplanes, with the particular directive AD/DHC-3/25 focusing on the wing strut and attachments retirement lives (section 11/69). This directive applies to all models of the DHC-3 series aircraft (section 11/69). The primary requirement of this directive is that the action taken must be in accordance with De H Canada Service Bulletin No 3/10 (section 11/69). Compliance with this directive is to be documented in a Requirement Document, which specifies the detailed steps and criteria for ensuring the aircraft meet the necessary safety standards (section 11/69).
The obligations imposed by this directive are comprehensive, ensuring that all operators of DHC-3 series aircraft must adhere to the specified retirement lives for the wing strut and attachments. This involves regular inspections, maintenance actions, and possibly the replacement of components as per the Service Bulletin to maintain airworthiness. The directive requires operators to keep meticulous records of all actions taken to comply with these requirements, ensuring that all work is traceable and verifiable by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). The adherence to the Service Bulletin and the maintenance of comprehensive documentation are critical to fulfilling these obligations.
Failure to comply with the provisions outlined in AD/DHC-3/25 can result in serious legal and safety consequences. The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 include provisions for both civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance. Civil penalties can include fines and other financial sanctions, while criminal penalties can involve imprisonment for individuals who are responsible for ensuring compliance. The exact penalties can vary, but they are designed to ensure strict adherence to safety directives to prevent any risk to aviation safety. Operators found in breach of these requirements can also face enforcement actions, such as grounding of aircraft, until compliance is achieved.