COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
DHC-3 (Otter) Series Aeroplanes
AD/DHC-3/10 Exhaust System NK
Applicability: As detailed in Requirement Document.
Requirement: Action in accordance with De H Canada EB “O” No 19.
Note: Canadian AD 56-12 refers.
Compliance: Forthwith.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended by the legislative instrument F2006B09058, introduces specific airworthiness directives to ensure the safety and operational reliability of DHC-3 (Otter) Series aeroplanes. This legislation was enacted to address gaps in the oversight of aircraft maintenance and safety standards, ensuring that all aircraft operating in Australian airspace meet stringent safety requirements. The regulations were established by the Australian Government, under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, to implement safety measures that align with international standards. The overarching policy objective of these directives is to maintain and enhance the safety of civil aviation by enforcing mandatory safety actions, such as those detailed in the De H Canada EB “O” No 19, which relate to the aircraft's exhaust system. This approach ensures that all relevant aircraft are compliant with necessary safety protocols, thereby safeguarding both passengers and crew.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, under the Civil Aviation Safety Authority’s schedule of airworthiness directives, applies to the DHC-3 (Otter) series aeroplanes. This regulation mandates adherence to De H Canada EB “O” No 19, as referenced in Requirement Document and Canadian AD 56-12, concerning the exhaust system. The directive is applicable to all entities and persons operating DHC-3 series aeroplanes within Australian airspace, ensuring compliance with the specified safety requirements. Compliance must be achieved forthwith, underscoring the critical nature of these safety measures. This regulation extends its reach to all operators of DHC-3 aeroplanes, regardless of the specific geographic location within Australia, thereby ensuring consistent application of safety standards across the Commonwealth. The regulation does not explicitly state any exclusions or exemptions, implying a broad application unless otherwise specified in subordinate instruments.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (Cth) under Part 39 - 105, specifically address the airworthiness directives for DHC-3 (Otter) series aeroplanes. Section AD/DHC-3/10 pertains to the exhaust system, as stipulated in the Requirement Document. This section mandates that any actions taken regarding the exhaust system must comply with De H Canada EB “O” No 19, with a reference to Canadian AD 56-12 for further guidance. The compliance requirement is immediate, meaning that the specified actions must be completed forthwith.
Entities and parties governed by these regulations are required to ensure that their DHC-3 (Otter) aeroplanes meet the airworthiness standards set out in the Civil Aviation Regulations. This involves adhering to the specified actions concerning the exhaust system as per the directive and the referenced Canadian AD. Operators must ensure that their maintenance and operational procedures align with these requirements, including conducting necessary inspections and repairs as dictated by the AD/DHC-3/10. This ensures the ongoing airworthiness of the aircraft, which is paramount for safety and regulatory compliance.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, particularly the airworthiness directives, can result in significant consequences. Section 105.020 of the Regulations outlines that non-compliance with airworthiness directives can lead to the issuance of penalties. These penalties can include both civil and criminal sanctions, with the potential for substantial fines and imprisonment. The maximum penalties are prescribed under section 105.025, which stipulates that an individual can be fined up to $275,000, and a corporation can be fined up to $1,375,000 for serious breaches of airworthiness requirements. These stringent measures underscore the importance of strict adherence to the directives to avoid severe repercussions.