COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
De Havilland DHC-1 (Chipmunk) Series Aeroplanes
AD/DHC-1/4 Undercarriage Torque Link Centre Hinge Joint - Modification
Applicability: All English production models. Document: 1. DH Chipmunk Mod. H.92; or
2. ANO 105.1.14.15.5.4.
Compliance: Forthwith.
4/56
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically within Part 39 - 105 Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, address the safety and operational standards for aircraft in Australia. One such regulation, AD/DHC-1/4, pertains to the modification of the undercarriage torque link centre hinge joint on De Havilland DHC-1 (Chipmunk) series aeroplanes, particularly those of English production models. This directive was enacted to ensure compliance with safety standards and mitigate potential risks associated with the specified component. The Australian Parliament established this regulation under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, with a clear policy objective to enhance the safety of civil aviation by addressing structural vulnerabilities and ensuring all aircraft meet required safety standards. The requirement for immediate compliance underscores the critical nature of the modifications to maintain airworthiness and protect both crew and passengers.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under Part 39 - 105, addresses the applicability and compliance requirements for airworthiness directives concerning certain aircraft models. One such directive pertains to the De Havilland DHC-1 (Chipmunk) Series Aeroplanes, particularly focusing on the undercarriage torque link centre hinge joint modification as outlined in AD/DHC-1/4. This regulation applies exclusively to English production models, specifically those identified as DH Chipmunk Mod. H.92 or referenced under ANO 105.1.14.15.5.4. The directive mandates that compliance with the specified modifications must be undertaken forthwith, ensuring the continued airworthiness of these aircraft. The regulations are enforced by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, extending their jurisdiction across the Commonwealth of Australia. This directive does not explicitly outline exclusions or exemptions but mandates immediate compliance, ensuring safety standards are met without deviation.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of AD/DHC-1/4 pertain to the undercarriage torque link centre hinge joint of De Havilland DHC-1 (Chipmunk) series aeroplanes, specifically English production models (Part 39 - 105). The regulation mandates that these aircraft must comply with the directive without delay (AD/DHC-1/4). The primary requirement is the modification of the undercarriage torque link centre hinge joint, as outlined in document 1, DH Chipmunk Mod. H.92, or ANO 105.1.14.15.5.4 (AD/DHC-1/4). This directive applies to all English production models of the Chipmunk aeroplanes (AD/DHC-1/4).
Operators and owners of the affected De Havilland DHC-1 series aeroplanes must ensure that the specified modifications to the undercarriage torque link centre hinge joint are implemented without any delay (AD/DHC-1/4). The regulation imposes an obligation on these parties to adhere to the directives as outlined in DH Chipmunk Mod. H.92 or ANO 105.1.14.15.5.4 to maintain airworthiness and safety standards (AD/DHC-1/4). Failure to comply with these provisions may result in legal consequences and could compromise the safety of the aircraft and its occupants.
Failure to comply with the AD/DHC-1/4 directive could result in various civil or criminal penalties, depending on the severity of the breach. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority has the authority to enforce these regulations and may impose fines or other penalties on non-compliant operators or owners. The maximum penalties are not explicitly stated in the text, but they can be significant, reflecting the importance of adhering to airworthiness directives for the safety of all involved in aviation operations. Non-compliance can lead to serious consequences, including grounding of the aircraft, legal action, and potential criminal charges in cases of gross negligence or willful disregard for safety regulations.