COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
DH114 (Heron) Series Aeroplanes
AD/DH114/4 Aileron Differential Pulley Stud - Modification NK
Applicability: All Series 1B and 2. Document: 1. DH Heron Mod. No. 475; or
2. ANO 105.1.14.17.5.4.
Compliance: Before 28 March 1955.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Commonwealth of Australia, form a crucial part of the regulatory framework governing civil aviation safety within the country. These regulations were introduced to ensure that all aspects of civil aviation operations adhere to the highest safety standards, thus safeguarding the well-being of passengers, crew, and the general public. Specifically, Part 39 - 105 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 pertains to the authority’s schedule of airworthiness directives, which are binding instructions issued to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. The policy objective behind these directives is to maintain and enhance the safety and efficiency of civil aviation operations through consistent and stringent regulatory oversight. The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 are administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, which is tasked with ensuring compliance and addressing any emerging safety issues within the aviation sector.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, includes Airworthiness Directives (AD) that govern the safety and maintenance of aircraft operating within Australia. AD/DH114/4 pertains to the modification of the aileron differential pulley stud for all Series 1B and 2 DH114 (Heron) series aeroplanes. This directive applies to aircraft identified as DH Heron Mod. No. 475 or as referenced in ANO 105.1.14.17.5.4, and must be complied with by any aircraft built before 28 March 1955. The scope of this directive ensures that all relevant aircraft are maintained to a standard that meets the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's (CASA) airworthiness criteria. The application of this legislation is comprehensive, covering all Heron series aeroplanes within the specified parameters, and is enforced across the Commonwealth of Australia. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions within the directive, meaning all applicable aircraft must adhere to the specified modifications to remain airworthy. The directive may also be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments issued by CASA, ensuring ongoing compliance and safety within the aviation industry.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, particularly Part 39 - 105, outlines the requirements for ensuring the airworthiness of certain aircraft types. Specifically, AD/DH114/4 pertains to the modification of the aileron differential pulley stud for all Series 1B and 2 DH114 (Heron) Series Aeroplanes. This directive mandates compliance with either DH Heron Mod. No. 475 or ANO 105.1.14.17.5.4 before 28 March 1955. These sections specify the necessary modifications to ensure the safety and compliance of these aircraft.
The obligations imposed by these regulations are clear and focused on maintaining the airworthiness of the affected aircraft. Operators and owners of Series 1B and 2 DH114 (Heron) aeroplanes must adhere to the modifications outlined in DH Heron Mod. No. 475 or ANO 105.1.14.17.5.4. This includes ensuring that the aileron differential pulley stud is modified as specified, which is a critical aspect of maintaining the structural integrity and safe operation of the aircraft. Failure to comply with these directives can result in the aircraft being deemed unairworthy, which could lead to grounding and potential operational disruptions.
In terms of consequences for non-compliance, the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 do not explicitly detail the specific penalties or consequences within the referenced sections. However, it is known that non-compliance with airworthiness directives can have significant legal and operational repercussions. Operators may face penalties, enforcement actions, or even criminal charges depending on the severity and impact of the non-compliance. The potential penalties can range from fines to more severe consequences, including suspension or revocation of the aircraft’s certificate of airworthiness. Ensuring compliance is therefore not only a legal requirement but also a critical safety measure.