CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.
The EASA issued AD 2008-0147-E affecting Eurocopter SA 365 N1, AS365 N2 and AS 365 N3 helicopters. France is the State of Design for these models. CASA has amended the equivalent Australian AD to AD/DAUPHIN/83 Amendment 2. The amended AD will become effective on 11 August 2008. This AD cancels and replaces the previous issue.
As this AD is issued because of Australia’s obligations under Convention on International Civil Aviation, and because it is issued in response to an AD raised by the relevant State of Design, no consultation of the Australian public has taken place on this AD. The Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the Manager, Systems and New Technologies in the Airworthiness Engineering Group, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, enacted by the Australian Parliament, is designed to ensure the safety of air navigation and provides the legislative framework for regulating civil aviation activities in Australia. The Act empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the purposes of the Act, with a primary focus on maintaining the safety of air navigation. One significant regulation under this Act is the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, which allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These directives are crucial for maintaining the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, as mandated by international standards set forth in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. CASA, as Australia's national airworthiness authority, assesses information from the State of Design and issues Australian ADs to enforce these international safety standards. This legislative approach ensures that Australian aviation practices align with global safety protocols.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation (Airworthiness) Regulations 1998, under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, apply to all aircraft and aeronautical products that are used, intended to be used, or are capable of being used in Australia. This includes both commercial and private aviation entities, as well as any individual or corporate operators of such aircraft within the Australian jurisdiction. The regulations are designed to ensure the safety and airworthiness of these aircraft, thereby protecting the interests of the public and complying with international civil aviation standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The regulations extend to mandating the issuance of airworthiness directives by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), Australia's national airworthiness authority, which is required to align with directives issued by the State of Design, in this case France, regarding specific aircraft models such as the Eurocopter SA 365 N1, AS365 N2, and AS 365 N3. The application of these regulations is not subject to exclusions or exemptions based on the text, but they do extend their reach through subordinate instruments, such as specific airworthiness directives that address particular safety concerns and must be adhered to by the relevant entities.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, specifically regulation 39.001, empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specified types of aircraft or aeronautical products (reg. 39.001(1)). These directives aim to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft in accordance with international standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. When CASA issues an AD, it is considered a legislative instrument under section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and is subject to disallowance under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (reg. 39.001(5)).
The ADs issued by CASA are designed to enforce compliance with airworthiness requirements. The State of Design, in this case France for the Eurocopter SA 365 N1, AS365 N2, and AS 365 N3 helicopters, holds the primary responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide necessary information to the States of Registry. The State of Registry, in this context CASA, must then assess this information and, if necessary, issue an Australian AD to enforce the requirements stipulated by the State of Design (Annex 8). This process ensures that Australian aircraft meet international safety standards.
Failure to comply with an AD can lead to significant legal consequences. Non-compliance with an AD may result in the grounding of an aircraft, which can have severe operational and financial repercussions for the aircraft owner or operator. Moreover, CASA has the authority to take enforcement actions against those who fail to comply with airworthiness directives, which could include fines, suspension of airworthiness certificates, or other regulatory penalties. The specific penalties for non-compliance are not detailed in the provided text, but they are likely to be substantial given the importance of air safety.
In summary, ADs are a critical tool in maintaining the safety of aircraft by ensuring compliance with international standards. CASA issues these directives in response to international safety requirements, and non-compliance can lead to serious consequences for those involved in aviation operations in Australia.