COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
Eurocopter SA 360 and SA 365 (Dauphin) Series Helicopters
AD/DAUPHIN/67 CARGO AIDS Cargo Release Units 1/2004
DM
Applicability: Models SA 360 C and SA 365 C, C1, C2, and C3 helicopters equipped with CARGO AIDS cargo release units part number 2MK2.
Requirement: Check the dimension of the cargo equipment rings in accordance with paragraph 2.B. of Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 01.40.
Note: DGAC AD F-2003-421 refers.
Compliance: Before any flight involving the use of CARGO AIDS cargo release unit part number 2MK2.
This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 3 December 2003.
Background: It has been determined that the use of certain size cargo rings is unsuitable for the cargo release unit hook, and could result in the ring jamming in the hook in the hook- open position. This situation could lead to the loss of the underslung load.
David Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 26 November 2003
The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 3 December 2003.
Page 1 of 1
Overview
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR) were enacted by the Parliament of Australia to establish a comprehensive framework for ensuring the safety of civil aviation operations within the country. This legislation was introduced to address the need for stringent safety standards and regulations to protect passengers, crew, and the general public from potential hazards associated with civil aviation. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) was designated as the responsible authority for enforcing these regulations. The policy objective of CASR 1998 is to maintain and enhance the safety of civil aviation by setting mandatory safety standards and procedures, including issuing Airworthiness Directives (ADs) when necessary to address specific safety concerns. These ADs are designed to mitigate risks and ensure the continued airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products. The AD in question, issued for Eurocopter SA 360 and SA 365 (Dauphin) Series Helicopters, was enacted to address a specific safety issue related to cargo release units that could potentially lead to the loss of underslung loads if not properly managed.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, mandate Airworthiness Directives issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to ensure the safety of aircraft and aeronautical products in Australia. These regulations apply to entities and individuals who operate or maintain aircraft and aeronautical products within Australian airspace, ensuring that all parties adhere to safety standards set by CASA. The scope of the Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/DAUPHIN/67 is limited to Eurocopter SA 360 and SA 365 (Dauphin) Series Helicopters, specifically models SA 360 C and SA 365 C, C1, C2, and C3 that are equipped with CARGO AIDS cargo release units part number 2MK2. The directive requires the immediate inspection and adjustment of the cargo equipment rings to prevent potential jamming of the cargo release unit hook, which could lead to the loss of the underslung load. The compliance must be achieved before any flight involving the use of the specified cargo release unit, with the directive becoming effective from 3 December 2003. The directive is a mandatory requirement under the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, with no specified exclusions or exemptions in the provided text, and it is enforceable across the Commonwealth of Australia.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, specifically under Part 39 - 105, mandate the issuance of Airworthiness Directives (AD) to ensure the safety of aircraft and aeronautical products. These directives are issued under the authority of a CASA delegate and are designed to address safety concerns identified in aircraft operations. In this instance, AD/DAUPHIN/67 applies to specific models of Eurocopter SA 360 and SA 365 (Dauphin) Series Helicopters equipped with CARGO AIDS cargo release units part number 2MK2 (section 1).
The AD specifies that operators of SA 360 C and SA 365 C, C1, C2, and C3 helicopters must check the dimensions of the cargo equipment rings in accordance with paragraph 2.B. of Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 01.40. This requirement is critical to prevent the cargo rings from jamming in the cargo release unit hook when it is in the open position, which could result in the loss of an underslung load. The directive references DGAC AD F-2003-421 for additional context. Operators must ensure this check is completed before any flight involving the use of the specified cargo release unit (section 2).
Operators governed by this AD are required to adhere to the specific instructions outlined in the directive. This includes conducting a thorough examination of the cargo equipment rings to ensure they meet the specified dimensions. Failure to comply with the AD could result in the unsafe operation of the aircraft, potentially leading to serious safety hazards. The directive becomes effective immediately upon its publication in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 3 December 2003 (section 3).
Failure to comply with the AD may result in civil or criminal penalties under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988. The exact nature of these penalties can vary, but they can include fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the breach and its impact on aviation safety. The maximum penalties are determined by the relevant courts and can be substantial, reflecting the importance of adhering to airworthiness directives (section 4).