AD/CRESCO/10 - MLG Axles

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2007L00111 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988

CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998

ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.  Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products.  Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry.  ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness.  Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.  When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.

The New Zealand CAA has issued AD DCA/Cresco/10 affecting Cresco 08-600 model aircraft.  New Zealand is the State of Design for this type.  CASA has assessed this AD and has issued Australian AD/CRESCO/10, which will become effective on 15 February 2007. 

As this AD is issued because of Australia’s obligations under Convention on International Civil Aviation, and because it is issued in response to an AD raised by the relevant State of Design, no consultation of the Australian public has taken place on this AD.  The Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.

The AD has been made by the Manager, Airframes in the Manufacturing, Certification and New Technologies Office, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.

Overview

The Civil Aviation Act 1988 was enacted to provide a legislative framework for the regulation of civil aviation in Australia, addressing the need for comprehensive safety and operational standards within the aviation sector. The Act empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the purposes of the Act, particularly focusing on ensuring the safety of air navigation. In line with this, the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 were established to support the Act by detailing the procedures and requirements for maintaining airworthiness. One significant provision is the authority for the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products, as outlined in regulation 39.001. These directives are intended to ensure that aircraft remain in a condition that meets safety standards, and they are considered legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. This legislative framework is integral to Australia's commitment to international aviation safety standards, particularly through adherence to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which mandates that States of Design and Registry collaborate to maintain the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Act 1988, along with the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. This regulatory framework applies to entities involved in the design, manufacture, maintenance, and operation of aircraft registered in Australia, as well as to the aircraft themselves. The Act and its regulations have a national reach, applying across Australia as a Commonwealth law. The issuance of ADs is primarily driven by the need to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, in line with international obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, specifically Annex 8. ADs are legislative instruments and are subject to disallowance under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. While the Act and Regulations provide a broad framework, specific ADs are often issued in response to directives from the State of Design or other international authorities, and these are tailored to address particular safety concerns identified by those authorities. This process means that not all ADs require consultation with the Australian public, and they generally do not necessitate a Regulatory Impact Statement.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Act 1988, under section 98, empowers the Governor-General to create regulations that safeguard air navigation, a task that falls under the purview of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. Regulation 39.001 specifically allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. An AD is considered a legislative instrument as per subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 and section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. These ADs are crucial for ensuring the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and are issued by most states that are signatories to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The State of Design holds primary responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide necessary information to ensure that the type remains airworthy. This is a mandate under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The State of Registry, on the other hand, is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of individual aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD for an aircraft type registered in Australia, CASA, as the national airworthiness authority, must review the AD and, if deemed appropriate, issue an Australian AD to enforce the requirements stipulated by the State of Design. In the case of the Cresco 08-600 model aircraft, the New Zealand Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) issued AD DCA/Cresco/10, and since New Zealand is the State of Design, CASA assessed the AD and issued Australian AD/CRESCO/10, which will take effect on 15 February 2007. This AD was issued due to Australia's obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation and in response to an AD issued by the relevant State of Design. Therefore, no consultation of the Australian public was necessary, and the Office of Regulatory Review determined that a Regulatory Impact Statement was not required for this AD. The AD was made by the Manager, Airframes, in the Manufacturing, Certification and New Technologies Office on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A(2) of the Act. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 impose several obligations on parties and entities governed by the Act. For instance, the State of Design must provide all necessary information to ensure the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type. Similarly, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, has the obligation to assess any ADs issued by the State of Design and, if necessary, issue corresponding Australian ADs to enforce the required safety measures. These obligations are critical for maintaining the safety and airworthiness standards of aircraft operating within Australian jurisdiction. Failure to comply with the requirements set out in airworthiness directives can lead to significant legal and financial consequences. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, non-compliance with an AD can result in civil penalties, including fines. The maximum penalty for non-compliance can be substantial, reflecting the seriousness of endangering public safety. Additionally, in severe cases, non-compliance may lead to criminal charges, especially if the non-compliance results in serious harm or fatalities. These penalties serve as a deterrent and underscore the importance of adhering to airworthiness directives to ensure the safety of air navigation.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Aviation Law
Regulatory Standards
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation
Compliance Obligations
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.