AD/CL-600/71 - State of Design Airworthiness Directives

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2007L01774 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988

CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998

ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.  Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products.  Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry.  ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness.  Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.  When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.

The Canadian TCA has issued ADs listed in Schedule 1 affecting Bombardier Regional Jet model CL-600-2B19, CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15 and CL-600-2D24 aircraft.  Canada is the State of Design for these types.  CASA has assessed the individual ADs and has issued Australian AD/CL-600/71, which will become effective on 29 June 2007.  This AD requires compliance with all the ADs listed in Schedule 1.

As this AD is issued because of Australia’s obligations under Convention on International Civil Aviation, and because it is issued in response to an AD raised by the relevant State of Design, no consultation of the Australian public has taken place on this AD.  The Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.

The AD has been made by the Acting Manager, New Technologies and Systems, in the Manufacturing, Certification and New Technologies Office, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.


Schedule 1 to Explanatory Statement
Airworthiness Directive AD/CL-600/71

 

TCA AD

Effective Date

Title

CF-93-02R1

6 May 1994

Passenger Door De-Icing Agent & Lubrication

CF-93-27R1

12 December 1995

Stall Protection System

CF-93-29

4 December 1993

Integrated Drive Generator

CF-94-14

19 October 1994

ADG Manual Deployment System

CF-94-21R1

30 November 1995

Elevator Damper Shear Pins

CF-95-08R2

3 September 1996

Horizontal Stab Trim Control/AFM Restriction

CF-95-10

8 August 1995

NLG Spring Bungee Assembly

CF-95-14R1

30 December 1996

Aileron Flutter Damper Shear Pin

CF-96-12R1

14 March 1997

MLG Shock Strut Pins Plating

CF-96-16R1

31 July 1998

Copilot’s Air Data System

CF-96-18

12 November 1996

DC Power Fuse Holder

CF-1998-14R4

25 June 2004

Flap System Failure

CF-98-35

30 October 1998

Electrical Conduits in Fuel Tanks

CF-98-40

23 December 1998

Main and APU Battery Connector

CF-99-09R1

11 June 1999

IDG Cable Harness

CF-2000-28

29 September 2000

Aileron Controls

CF-2002-06

4 March 2002

Rudder Travel Limiter Actuators

CF-2002-19

11 March 2002

Center Tank Fuel Line Failures

CF-2002-22

8 April 2002

Center Tank Fuel Line Failures

CF-2002-35R2

30 January 2005

Aileron Stiffness

CF-2002-41

25 October 2002

Main Landing Gear Side-Brace Fitting Shaft

CF-2003-01R1

25 January 2006

Centre Fuel Tank – Fuel Tube Failure

CF-2003-03

14 March 2003

Landing Gear Control Handle Assembly

CF-2003-07

25 March 2003

Wing Anti-Ice Ducts

CF-2003-14R1

26 February 2005

Wing Root Area Wire Damage

CF-2003-23R2

19 August 2005

Main Landing Gear Door Separation During Flight

CF-2003-26

8 December 2003

Pitch Feel Simulator

CF-2004-04R3

8 April 2004

Fuel Ejector Leak Check

CF-2004-14

24 August 2004

Aft Pressure Bulkhead Structure and Hydraulic Lines

CF-2004-20

1 November 2004

Hydraulic Line Shields

CF-2004-23R1

18 August 2005

Camloc Fasteners on Center Pedestal

CF-2005-01

2 February 2005

Cold Weather Operations

CF-2005-02

2 February 2005

Cold Weather Operations

CF-2005-13R1

7 November 2005

Cracking of Aft Pressure Bulkhead Web

CF-2005-18

11 July 2005

Missing Restrictor on Refuel / Defuel Shut-Off Valves

CF-2005-31

19 September 2005

Camloc Fasteners on Centre Pedestal – Interference with Rudder Pedals

CF-2005-35

3 October 2005

Junction Boxes – Leach TDH-Series Relays Malfunction

CF-2006-07

25 April 2006

AC Contactor Failure

CF-2006-04

28 April 2006

Aileron Control System – Reduction in Task Interval for Backlash Check

CF-2006-11

19 June 2006

Improper Installation of Chemical Oxygen Generator Release Pin

CF-2006-20R1

16 October 2006

Horizontal Stabilizer Trim – Uncommanded Motion

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Act 1988, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, provides the legal framework for the regulation of civil aviation within the country. It aims to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation, including the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. Under this Act, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has the authority to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) in accordance with regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. These ADs are legislative instruments made under the authority of the Governor-General and are intended to mandate safety requirements for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. The ADs are in response to Australia's obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation and aim to harmonise safety standards with other contracting states. Given their nature, these directives are not subject to public consultation or the requirement for a Regulatory Impact Statement, as they are issued in direct response to international obligations and assessments by CASA. The AD/CL-600/71 was issued by CASA in response to airworthiness directives issued by Transport Canada concerning Bombardier Regional Jet models CL-600-2B19, CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15, and CL-600-2D24. CASA assessed the Canadian ADs and determined that corresponding Australian ADs were necessary to ensure compliance with international safety standards. This directive, effective from 29 June 2007, mandates adherence to all the specified Canadian ADs, thereby maintaining the airworthiness of these aircraft types registered in Australia.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Act 1988, along with the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, provides a framework for ensuring the safety of air navigation, including the issuance of airworthiness directives (ADs). Under the Act, the Governor-General may make regulations for safety purposes, and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) can issue ADs for specific kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products as stipulated in regulation 39.001. These ADs are legislative instruments, disallowable under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and must be assessed and, if necessary, mandated by CASA to ensure compliance with international standards set out in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. In the case of Bombardier Regional Jet model CL-600 aircraft, CASA has issued AD/CL-600/71, effective from 29 June 2007, in response to Canadian Transport Canada ADs. This process does not involve public consultation as it adheres to international obligations, and CASA has determined that such directives do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement. The ADs listed in Schedule 1 to the Explanatory Statement detail specific compliance requirements for various Bombardier Regional Jet models, all of which must be adhered to by relevant entities within the aviation industry.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation (Safety) Regulations 1998, under section 39.001, empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products (section 39.001(5)). These ADs are legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. They are crucial for ensuring the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types, as mandated by Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which places the responsibility on the State of Design. In Australia, CASA, as the national airworthiness authority, must evaluate any ADs issued by the State of Design and, if deemed necessary, issue corresponding Australian ADs to enforce the required safety measures. Compliance with ADs is a legal obligation for the State of Registry of individual aircraft. This entails that they must implement or adopt the requirements outlined in the ADs to ensure the ongoing airworthiness of the aircraft. The State of Registry must adhere to the ADs issued by CASA, which are typically in response to ADs from the State of Design, as is the case with AD/CL-600/71 for Bombardier Regional Jet models CL-600-2B19, CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15 and CL-600-2D24. The AD/CL-600/71, which became effective on 29 June 2007, mandates compliance with all the Canadian Transport Canada ADs listed in Schedule 1 of the explanatory statement. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD can lead to severe consequences. Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, CASA has the authority to enforce compliance through various means, including the imposition of fines and other penalties. The specific penalties for non-compliance with ADs are not explicitly stated in the provided text, but it is implied that CASA can take appropriate action against entities that fail to adhere to the safety directives. Given the critical nature of airworthiness directives in maintaining the safety of air navigation, the potential penalties for non-compliance are likely to be significant, reflecting the serious nature of the safety breaches involved.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Aviation Law
International Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.