COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Cessna 500 (Citation) Series Aeroplanes
AD/CESSNA 500/26 Outflow Safety Valve 5/96
Applicability: All Cessna 500 series aircraft.
Requirement: Unless previously carried out, action in accordance with Allied Signal Service Bulletin 103576-21-4056.
Note: FAA AD 95-25-10 Amdt 39-9456 refers.
Compliance: Within 200 hours time in service from 25 April 1996 or prior to 31 July 1996, whichever occurs first.
Background: The manufacturer has advised that cracking has been found in two valve poppets of a particular batch. This cracking may cause failure of the outflow safety valve which could result in rapid decompression of the aircraft.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, amended in 2006, were enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate civil aviation safety standards, and to ensure the safety and efficiency of air travel. These regulations are administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), which is responsible for overseeing the safety of civil aviation operations within Australia. A specific focus of these regulations is to mandate airworthiness directives that address identified safety issues in aircraft operations. The problem or gap this legislation aimed to address includes the need for stringent safety measures to be established and enforced, particularly concerning the identification and mitigation of potential hazards that could compromise the safety of aircraft and their passengers. This particular airworthiness directive concerning the Cessna 500 series aeroplanes was introduced to ensure that any identified issues with the outflow safety valve were promptly addressed to prevent rapid decompression and subsequent safety risks.
The policy objective of the airworthiness directive AD/CESSNA 500/26 is to mandate corrective actions on the outflow safety valves of all Cessna 500 series aircraft. This directive requires compliance within a specified timeframe to mitigate the risk of valve failure due to identified cracking in the valve poppets. By mandating adherence to the Allied Signal Service Bulletin 103576-21-4056, the directive ensures that all affected aircraft are brought up to the required safety standards. This action is critical to maintaining the airworthiness of the aircraft and ensuring the safety of all persons on board, aligning with the overarching goal of the Civil Aviation Regulations to maintain high standards of safety in civil aviation.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, applies to all Cessna 500 series aeroplanes. The regulation mandates that an action must be taken in accordance with the Allied Signal Service Bulletin 103576-21-4056 unless such action has already been carried out. This requirement is aimed at addressing the issue of cracking found in the valve poppets of a particular batch, which could potentially lead to a failure of the outflow safety valve and result in rapid decompression of the aircraft. The compliance deadline stipulates that the necessary action must be completed within 200 hours of time in service from 25 April 1996 or before 31 July 1996, whichever comes first. The regulation references FAA AD 95-25-10 Amdt 39-9456 for further guidance on the matter. The scope of the regulation is national, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia, and it does not explicitly outline any exclusions or exemptions within the provided text. The applicability of the regulation may be further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments issued under the Civil Aviation Act 1988.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, under Part 39 - 105, include a Schedule of Airworthiness Directives specifically for the Cessna 500 (Citation) Series Aeroplanes. The directive in question, AD/CESSNA 500/26, pertains to the outflow safety valve and is applicable to all Cessna 500 series aircraft (section 39 - 105). The directive mandates that action be taken in accordance with Allied Signal Service Bulletin 103576-21-4056 unless it has already been carried out. This directive is cross-referenced with FAA AD 95-25-10 Amdt 39-9456, indicating alignment with international safety standards. The requirement is that the specified action must be completed within 200 hours of time in service from 25 April 1996, or prior to 31 July 1996, whichever comes first. The urgency of this directive stems from the manufacturer’s discovery of cracking in two valve poppets from a particular batch, which could lead to the failure of the outflow safety valve and potentially result in rapid decompression of the aircraft.
The obligations imposed by this directive are clear and specific. Operators of Cessna 500 series aircraft must ensure that the action outlined in the Allied Signal Service Bulletin is taken within the stipulated timeframe. This involves inspecting and, if necessary, replacing or repairing the outflow safety valve to prevent any risk of cracking and subsequent failure. The directive requires operators to be diligent in monitoring the aircraft's service hours to ensure compliance with the 200-hour limit or the absolute date of 31 July 1996. Additionally, operators must maintain records of the actions taken to comply with this directive, as this documentation may be required for future audits or inspections by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA).
Failure to comply with the requirements of AD/CESSNA 500/26 may result in significant legal consequences. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, non-compliance with airworthiness directives can be considered an offence. The penalties for such offences can include substantial fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment. The specific penalties can vary based on the severity of the breach and the potential risk posed to aviation safety. Operators found in breach of this directive may also face civil penalties imposed by CASA, which could include financial penalties, suspension or revocation of the aircraft’s certificate of airworthiness, and mandatory corrective actions. These consequences underscore the importance of adhering to the directive to ensure the continued safety of the aircraft and its occupants.