COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Cessna 320 Series Aeroplanes
AD/CESSNA 320/26 Main Landing Gear Fork-Bolt - Replacement 8/76
Applicability: All models.
Document: 1. Cessna SL ME75-23; or
2. FAA AD 76-13-07.
Compliance: As detailed in the requirement document.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (Cth) were enacted to ensure the safety of civil aviation in Australia. Among its many provisions, Part 39 - 105, which pertains to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, addresses specific safety concerns related to particular aircraft models. One such directive, AD/CESSNA 320/26, pertains to the replacement of the main landing gear fork-bolt on Cessna 320 series aeroplanes. This directive was introduced to address potential safety issues identified with the fork-bolt of the main landing gear. It is applicable to all models of the specified aircraft series and requires compliance with the detailed requirements outlined in the relevant documents, such as the Cessna SL ME75-23 or the FAA AD 76-13-07. The policy objective is to maintain the highest standards of airworthiness and safety in Australian civil aviation, thereby protecting the public and ensuring the integrity of the aviation industry.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, under the scope of Part 39, specifically address the airworthiness directives for various aircraft types, including the Cessna 320 Series Aeroplanes. This legislation mandates that all models of the Cessna 320 series must comply with the requirements outlined in AD/CESSNA 320/26, which pertains to the replacement of the main landing gear fork-bolt. This directive is applicable to all operators of Cessna 320 aeroplanes within the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring that these aircraft meet the necessary safety standards set forth by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. The requirement document, which details the compliance measures, may include references to the Cessna SL ME75-23 or the FAA AD 76-13-07. The application of these regulations is not limited by state or territory boundaries, maintaining a national standard for aviation safety. While the regulations are comprehensive, they may be further refined or extended through subordinate instruments, ensuring that the safety directives remain current and effective.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (CAR) under Part 39 - 105, specifically AD/CESSNA 320/26, mandate the replacement of the main landing gear fork-bolt for all models of Cessna 320 Series aeroplanes. This is clearly stated in section 8/76, which specifies the applicability of this directive to all models of the Cessna 320 series. Compliance with this Airworthiness Directive (AD) must be achieved as detailed in the requirement document, which can be either the Cessna SL ME75-23 or the FAA AD 76-13-07.
The AD imposes several obligations on the parties responsible for maintaining the airworthiness of the Cessna 320 Series aeroplanes. Primarily, these obligations involve ensuring that the replacement of the main landing gear fork-bolt is carried out according to the specified requirements. This includes the use of the correct documentation and adherence to the detailed procedures outlined in the requirement documents provided by Cessna or the FAA. The directive is clear that compliance must be achieved through these prescribed documents, ensuring a standardised approach to maintaining the safety and airworthiness of these aircraft.
Failure to comply with the AD/CESSNA 320/26 can result in serious consequences. The regulations stipulate that non-compliance with airworthiness directives is an offence under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. This can lead to both civil and criminal penalties. For instance, operators who fail to comply with these directives may face fines, with the maximum penalty for a corporation potentially reaching substantial amounts as prescribed under the relevant sections of the Act. Additionally, non-compliance can lead to the grounding of the aircraft until the required maintenance is performed, which could disrupt operations and lead to further financial and logistical challenges.