CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.
The United States FAA issued AD 2006-06-06, affecting Cessna C208 and C208B aircraft in 2006. The United States is the State of Design for these aircraft. As a result of a request from industry, CASA has amended the equivalent Australian AD to correct the applicability section of the AD due to a typographical error. The amended AD, AD/CESSNA 208/20 Amendment 1, will become effective on 3 August 2006. This AD cancels and replaces the previous issue.
As this AD is issued because of Australia’s obligations under Convention on International Civil Aviation, and because it is issued in response to an AD raised by the relevant State of Design, no consultation of the Australian public has taken place on this AD. The Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the Manager, New Technologies and Systems, in the Manufacturing, Certification and New Technologies Office, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, provides a legislative framework to ensure the safety of air navigation within Australia. This Act empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for air safety, which includes the issuance of airworthiness directives (ADs) by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. These ADs are legislative instruments, disallowable under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and aim to maintain the continuing airworthiness of aircraft in accordance with international standards set by the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The policy objective of the ADs is to ensure that aircraft types registered in Australia comply with safety standards set by their State of Design and adopted by CASA as the national airworthiness authority. This legislative approach ensures that Australia meets its obligations under international aviation agreements while maintaining stringent safety standards for aircraft operating within its jurisdiction.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, mandate the Australian Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products, in line with international standards and agreements. This regulatory framework ensures the ongoing airworthiness of aircraft registered in Australia, aligning with the responsibilities of the State of Registry under Annex 8 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation. ADs serve as critical tools for maintaining safety standards and are typically issued by states of design, with CASA assessing and implementing these directives for aircraft registered within Australia. The process of issuing ADs, including the amendment and replacement of previous directives, is conducted without public consultation due to their international compliance basis, and they are deemed not to require a Regulatory Impact Statement. The ADs are legislative instruments, subject to disallowance, and are issued under the authority of CASA, reflecting Australia's commitment to international aviation safety protocols.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, under regulation 39.001, empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These ADs, as outlined in subregulation 39.001(5), are considered disallowable instruments under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and are legislative instruments in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The necessity for these directives arises from the continuing airworthiness requirements stipulated under Annex 8 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which places the responsibility for the ongoing airworthiness of an aircraft type with the State of Design. This obligation extends to providing necessary information to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry, of which ADs are the primary vehicle.
For Australia, the State of Registry is tasked with ensuring the continuing airworthiness of individual aircraft, as mandated by Annex 8. This entails developing or adopting specific requirements to maintain airworthiness. When the State of Design, such as the United States for Cessna C208 and C208B aircraft, issues an AD, CASA, as Australia's national airworthiness authority, must evaluate this information. If deemed necessary, CASA must then issue a corresponding Australian AD to enforce the requirements of the State of Design. This process was recently exemplified when CASA amended the Australian AD for Cessna C208 and C208B aircraft to correct a typographical error in response to AD 2006-06-06 issued by the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The amended AD, AD/CESSNA 208/20 Amendment 1, became effective on 3 August 2006, replacing the previous version.
In terms of obligations, the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations impose a responsibility on CASA to assess and, if necessary, issue airworthiness directives to ensure compliance with international safety standards. This includes the obligation to review and amend existing directives as required, such as the correction of errors identified in the original AD. Furthermore, CASA must ensure that these directives are issued in accordance with the legislative framework provided by the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. Since these ADs are issued under Australia’s obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation and in response to directives from the relevant State of Design, there is no requirement for public consultation or a Regulatory Impact Statement. Instead, the ADs are made by authorised personnel within CASA, specifically the Manager, New Technologies and Systems, in the Manufacturing, Certification and New Technologies Office, in line with subsection 84A(2) of the Act.
Breaching the requirements set out in an airworthiness directive can have serious legal consequences. While the specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the provided text, generally, failure to comply with airworthiness directives can lead to civil penalties under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, including fines. In more severe cases, persistent non-compliance could result in criminal charges, with potential imprisonment, particularly if the non-compliance leads to a safety incident. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as the specific provisions of the Civil Aviation Act and any relevant regulations.