AD/CESSNA 180/75 Amdt 2 - Forward Door Post Bulkhead

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B05088 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 


AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below revokes Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/CESSNA 180/75 Amdt 1 and issues the following AD under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.

 

Cessna 180, 182 and Wren 460 Series Aeroplanes

 

AD/CESSNA 180/75

Amdt 2


Forward Door Post Bulkhead 1/2002

 

 

Applicability: All tricycle undercarriage models that do not have Cessna Service Kit (SK)182-115 incorporated as per Cessna SEB95-19.

 

Requirement: 1. Visually inspect the wing strut lower attachment structure to determine the type of strut attachment used. Aircraft with the earlier embedded type strut attachment are not subject to any further action. Aircraft with strut attachment fittings of the type with the protruding lug, similar to that shown in the diagram below, must comply with Requirement paragraphs 2 and 3.

 

Note 1: This inspection may be easily accomplished by removing the strut attachment fairing at the lower end of one of the wing struts. Structure requiring further inspection is characterised by the strut attachment lug protruding beyond the fuselage skin.

 

2.        Visually inspect for cracks at the inside edge of the left hand and right hand bend relief notches of the forward door post bulkhead.

 

3.        Visually inspect for loose or working fasteners securing the lower strut end pick- up fitting to the forward door post bulkhead. The inspection areas and typical crack location are shown in the diagram below.

 

Note 2: Inspection in accordance with Requirement 2 will initially require removal of certain floor panels. Incorporation of inspection holes in accordance with an approved modification will allow inspection of the relief notch without requiring removal of the floor panels.

 

Note 3: Inspection in accordance with Requirement 3 may be accomplished from outside the aircraft via the hole exposed by removing the lower wing strut fairing.

 

Compliance:  Inspect before exceeding 1000 hours aircraft time in service, before 50 hours time in service after 20 July 1995, or before 200 hours time in service since last inspected in accordance with this Directive, whichever occurs last.

 

Thereafter inspect in accordance with Requirements 2 and 3, as applicable, at intervals not to exceed 200 hours time in service.

 

Note 4: Repaired or modified structure must continue to be inspected unless a variation to the requirements of this AD has been approved.

 

This amendment becomes effective on 24 January 2002.

 

Background:  Numerous reports have been received of cracking in this area on Cessna models 206 and 182. The bend relief notch in the bulkhead serves as a stress concentration notch, causing fatigue cracks to propagate across the bulkhead web. The strut attachment area forms part of the wing’s primary load path, and loss of strength in this area could be catastrophic. Although most of this area is covered by the strut attach fitting and a bulkhead reinforcement doubler, the inside edge of the bulkhead, where the cracks have been initiating, is visible without removing the lower strut attachment fitting.

 

Amendment 1 reduced the initial inspection time and inspection interval as several cracks have been found in model 182 aircraft at a low time in service. Cessna SEB 93-5, for the model 206, provides background information.

 

Amendment 2 is issued to allow the installation of Cessna Service kit 182-115 as terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirement.

 

Amendment 1 of this Airworthiness Directive became effective on 20 July 1995.

 

The original issue of this Airworthiness Directive became effective on 27 April 1995.


 

David Alan Villiers

Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 3 December 2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 9 January 2002.

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has issued an Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1(1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, revoking AD/CESSNA 180/75 Amendment 1 and introducing Amendment 2 for the Cessna 180, 182 and Wren 460 Series Aeroplanes. The AD was enacted to address the issue of cracking in the forward door post bulkhead and wing strut lower attachment structure of certain Cessna models, which has been reported as a potentially catastrophic safety concern. The policy objective of the AD is to ensure the ongoing airworthiness of these aircraft by mandating specific inspections and maintenance actions to prevent structural failure. The AD specifies that the inspection and compliance requirements must be carried out in accordance with the outlined instructions and timelines, with the amendment becoming effective on 24 January 2002.

Scope and Application

The Airworthiness Directive issued under subregulation 39.1(1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 applies to all tricycle undercarriage models of the Cessna 180, 182, and Wren 460 series aeroplanes that do not have the Cessna Service Kit (SK) 182-115 incorporated as per Cessna SEB 95-19. This legislation is issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) and pertains to the inspection and maintenance requirements of certain structural components in the specified aircraft to ensure continued airworthiness. The AD requires that inspections be conducted based on specific conditions and intervals related to aircraft time in service. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this AD is within the Commonwealth of Australia, as CASA is the regulatory authority for civil aviation safety in Australia. Any exclusions or exemptions from this directive would need to be explicitly stated in subordinate instruments or specific CASA approvals. The AD mandates inspections to be carried out at specified intervals and conditions, with the directive becoming effective from 24 January 2002.

Key Provisions

The main sections of the Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/CESSNA 180/75 Amdt 2 cover the applicability, requirement, and compliance of inspections for specific Cessna models. The applicability section (paragraph 1) specifies that the AD applies to all tricycle undercarriage models that do not have Cessna Service Kit (SK)182-115 incorporated as per Cessna SEB95-19. The requirement section (paragraphs 2 and 3) details the specific inspections that must be performed on the aircraft, including visual inspections of the wing strut lower attachment structure, the forward door post bulkhead for cracks, and the fasteners securing the lower strut end pick-up fitting to the forward door post bulkhead. The compliance section (paragraph 4) specifies that the inspections must be conducted before exceeding certain aircraft time in service intervals, with specific timelines for initial and subsequent inspections. The AD imposes several obligations on the parties it governs, primarily focusing on compliance with the specified inspection requirements. Operators of affected Cessna models must ensure that the inspections are conducted by qualified personnel and in accordance with the instructions outlined in the requirement section. Additionally, operators must maintain records of all inspections performed and any actions taken as a result of the inspections. The AD also mandates that any repaired or modified structure must continue to be inspected unless a variation to the requirements of this AD has been approved. Failure to comply with the AD can result in serious consequences. While the AD itself does not specify penalties for non-compliance, non-compliance with ADs can lead to enforcement actions under the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) and the Civil Aviation Act 1988. Potential consequences include fines, enforcement notices, and legal action for breaches of airworthiness regulations. Operators found in breach of the AD may also face operational restrictions or the grounding of their aircraft until the required inspections and repairs are completed.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.