COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Cessna 177 Series Aeroplanes
AD/CESSNA 177/13 Front Seat Restraint Installations 10/71
Applicability: All models.
Requirement: Modify front seat restraint installations by fitting a safety harness in accordance with a scheme approved by the Secretary.
Compliance: Before 1 September 1972.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, were established to regulate civil aviation safety within the country, ensuring that all aircraft meet specified safety standards. One particular legislative instrument, F2006B05008, addresses a critical safety issue concerning the Cessna 177 Series Aeroplanes through an Airworthiness Directive. This directive, AD/CESSNA 177/13, specifically targets the installation of front seat restraints, mandating that a safety harness must be fitted in compliance with a scheme approved by the Secretary. The policy objective of this directive is to enhance the safety of pilots and passengers by ensuring that appropriate restraint measures are in place, thereby reducing the risk of injury in the event of an emergency or accident. The directive requires all models of the Cessna 177 Series to implement these modifications before 1 September 1972, underscoring the urgency and importance of adhering to these safety standards.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically PART 39 - 105, under the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) schedule of airworthiness directives, mandates the installation of safety harnesses in the front seat restraint systems of all Cessna 177 series aeroplanes. This requirement is outlined in AD/CESSNA 177/13, which applies universally to all models within this aeroplane series. The regulation is designed to enhance safety by ensuring that the front seat restraint installations conform to a scheme approved by the Secretary. Compliance with this directive was mandatory and had to be achieved before 1 September 1972. The directive applies to any person or entity operating a Cessna 177 series aeroplane within Australia and its territories, thereby extending its jurisdictional reach across the Commonwealth. The regulation does not specify any exclusions or exemptions, and compliance is strictly enforced to maintain the highest safety standards in civil aviation. The scope of this directive can be further detailed through subordinate instruments issued by CASA, which provide specific guidelines and implementation protocols.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, includes an airworthiness directive (AD) pertaining to Cessna 177 Series Aeroplanes, designated as AD/CESSNA 177/13. This directive mandates the modification of front seat restraint installations by requiring the fitting of a safety harness (section 10/71). This requirement applies to all models within the specified aircraft series, ensuring that all units meet the stipulated safety standards.
Under this directive, the primary obligation falls on aircraft owners, operators, and maintenance providers to ensure that the required modifications are carried out before a specified deadline. Specifically, the modifications must be completed before 1 September 1972 (section 10/71). The safety harness installation must adhere to a scheme approved by the Secretary, indicating that the chosen method must meet certain regulatory criteria to be considered compliant.
Failure to comply with the requirements outlined in AD/CESSNA 177/13 could result in significant consequences. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the text, non-compliance with airworthiness directives generally can lead to enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). This may include grounding of the aircraft, fines, and potential criminal charges for individuals or entities responsible for the oversight of the aircraft. The severity of penalties can vary based on the nature and extent of the non-compliance, with potential maximum penalties being substantial in cases of serious safety violations.