CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.
State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009 are defined as ADs per Civil Aviation Safety Regulations Part 39.001A.
CASA issued AD/BN-2/85 Amdt 1 affecting Britten-Norman BN-2 aircraft. The EASA issued AD 2009-0150R1 on 7 December 2009 which supersedes the requirements of AD/BN-2/85 Amdt 1, and as such this AD has been cancelled. The EASA acts on behalf of the UK, the state of design for these aircraft. The cancellation will become effective on 21 December 2009.
No consultation with the Australian public has taken place on this AD cancellation. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the Manager, Continuing Airworthiness in the Airworthiness and Engineering Branch, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 94 (1) of the Act.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Act 1988 was enacted to provide a comprehensive legal framework for civil aviation in Australia, ensuring the safety and efficiency of air navigation and operations. The Act empowers the Governor-General to make regulations necessary for the safety of air navigation, and under this authority, the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 were established. One key provision of these regulations is the issuance of airworthiness directives (ADs) by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). ADs are legislative instruments that mandate corrective actions for aircraft or aeronautical products to ensure their continuing airworthiness. When a State of Design issues an AD, CASA must assess and, if necessary, issue an Australian AD to align with international standards and ensure compliance with Australian regulations. This process helps maintain safety standards and aligns Australian practices with international aviation safety protocols, as stipulated in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The ADs are a crucial part of the continuing airworthiness management, with CASA acting as Australia's national airworthiness authority.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 govern the issuance of airworthiness directives (ADs) under regulation 39.001, with these directives being legislative instruments subject to disallowance under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and registration under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The Act applies to the issuance of ADs by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft registered in Australia, thereby impacting aircraft manufacturers, operators, and maintenance providers. These regulations have a national jurisdictional reach, as CASA is the national airworthiness authority in Australia, mandated to ensure compliance with international standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The application of ADs is not restricted by geographic boundaries within Australia but is focused on the national fleet. The application of ADs does not extend to non-commercial aircraft or those not registered in Australia unless they are types designed within Australia. The ADs can be issued to address safety concerns or maintenance requirements for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products, and these directives are often issued in response to recommendations from the aircraft's State of Design or other contracting states under ICAO regulations.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, specifically regulation 39.001, allow the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for types of aircraft or aeronautical products. According to subregulation 39.001(5), an AD is considered a disallowable instrument under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and it is a legislative instrument as per section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. This regulation is based on Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which stipulates that the State of Design is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide necessary information to States of Registry to ensure the safety of air navigation. The State of Registry, in turn, is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of individual aircraft, and must develop or adopt requirements to ensure this safety.
Under these regulations, when the State of Design issues an AD for a type of aircraft registered in Australia, CASA must assess the information and, if necessary, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design. This ensures that Australian aircraft meet international safety standards. The cancellation of AD/BN-2/85 Amdt 1, affecting Britten-Norman BN-2 aircraft, and its replacement by the EASA AD 2009-0150R1, is an example of how these provisions are applied. CASA issued AD/BN-2/85 Amdt 1, but this was superseded and subsequently cancelled by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) on 7 December 2009. This cancellation became effective on 21 December 2009. It is important to note that no consultation with the Australian public was conducted for this AD cancellation, and the Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations impose several obligations on parties and entities governed by the Act. CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess any AD issued by a State of Design that pertains to aircraft registered in Australia and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to enforce the requirements. The State of Design is required to provide necessary information to ensure the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type. The State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of individual aircraft. Failure to comply with these obligations can result in significant safety risks, potentially leading to aircraft being deemed unairworthy, which could have severe consequences for both the operators and passengers.
Failure to comply with the obligations and requirements set forth in the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations can lead to civil and criminal consequences. While specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the provided text, the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and associated regulations generally provide for enforcement actions such as fines and imprisonment. For example, section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 allows for the imposition of administrative penalties for breaches of the regulations, with potential maximum penalties outlined in other sections of the Act and related legislation. Furthermore, CASA can take enforcement actions, including grounding aircraft that do not comply with ADs, which can have serious implications for aircraft operators. These penalties and consequences underscore the importance of adhering to airworthiness directives to maintain the highest safety standards in civil aviation.