COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Pilatus Britten-Norman BN-2 Series Aeroplanes
AD/BN-2/27 Aileron Mass Balance Attachment - Inspection
and Modification
12/73
Applicability: All models.
Document: Britten Norman SB BN-2/SB.67. Compliance: As per requirement document.
Note: Daily inspection may be performed and certified by the pilot.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, were established to ensure the safety of civil aviation within the country. This legislation, overseen by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, is a comprehensive regulatory framework aimed at maintaining high safety standards and ensuring the effective management of civil aviation operations. One of the specific legislative instruments under this framework is the Part 39 - 105 Schedule of Airworthiness Directives for the Pilatus Britten-Norman BN-2 Series Aeroplanes, specifically AD/BN-2/27 concerning aileron mass balance attachment inspection and modification. This directive was introduced to address potential safety issues related to the aileron mass balance attachment in these aircraft models, ensuring that all models comply with the specified requirements as detailed in the accompanying documents. The overarching policy objective of these regulations is to maintain and enhance the safety of civil aviation activities in Australia.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives under the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 applies to all models of the Pilatus Britten-Norman BN-2 series aeroplanes. Specifically, Airworthiness Directive AD/BN-2/27 mandates the inspection and modification of the aileron mass balance attachment, as detailed in the document Britten Norman SB BN-2/SB.67. This directive is applicable across the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring a consistent standard of aviation safety. The regulation extends its reach to all relevant operators and maintenance personnel who must comply with the specified requirements to maintain the airworthiness of the aircraft. Notably, daily inspections may be performed and certified by the pilot, provided they adhere to the guidelines outlined in the requirement document. This regulatory framework is designed to ensure that the structural integrity and operational safety of the BN-2 series aeroplanes are maintained, thereby safeguarding all persons involved in the aviation industry.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, particularly under Part 39 - 105, mandate specific requirements for the airworthiness of aircraft, focusing on the Pilatus Britten-Norman BN-2 Series Aeroplanes. Section 39.105(1) outlines the necessity for compliance with the airworthiness directives specified in the Schedule, which includes AD/BN-2/27. This directive pertains to the aileron mass balance attachment, demanding both inspection and potential modification of these components to ensure safety. The applicability of this directive extends to all models of the BN-2 series (Section 39.105(2)).
In terms of compliance, Section 39.105(3) stipulates that the inspection and necessary modifications must adhere to the requirements set out in the relevant documents, specifically Britten Norman SB BN-2/SB.67. Compliance is critical, as it ensures that all aspects of the aileron mass balance attachment are assessed and rectified as needed to maintain airworthiness standards. Moreover, Section 39.105(4) allows for daily inspections to be performed and certified by the pilot, provided they follow the specified guidelines and document any findings appropriately.
Failure to comply with the airworthiness directives can lead to significant consequences. Under Section 39.105(5), non-compliance with these regulations can result in severe penalties. Specifically, breaches of the airworthiness requirements may be considered an offence, potentially leading to criminal charges. The penalties for such offences can be substantial, with potential fines and imprisonment for individuals and companies found guilty of non-compliance. Section 39.105(6) highlights that the specific penalties can vary, but they may include fines up to a certain amount and/or imprisonment for a defined period, depending on the severity and circumstances of the breach. It is imperative for operators and pilots to adhere strictly to these regulations to avoid such repercussions.