COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Pilatus Britten-Norman BN-2 Series Aeroplanes
AD/BN-2/2 Fuel Tank Sump - Modification NK
Applicability: All models.
Document: Britten-Norman Modification No. NB/M/350. Compliance: Before 16 May 1968.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 were enacted to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework governing civil aviation within Australia, ensuring safety and compliance with international standards. This particular legislative instrument, F2006B04731, pertains to Part 39 - 105 Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives and focuses on the Pilatus Britten-Norman BN-2 Series Aeroplanes. Specifically, Airworthiness Directive AD/BN-2/2 addresses modifications to the fuel tank sump, as outlined in Britten-Norman Modification No. NB/M/350, with compliance required before 16 May 1968. The intent of this directive is to enhance the safety and reliability of the aircraft by mandating specific structural modifications, thereby mitigating potential risks associated with fuel tank integrity. The enactment and enforcement of these regulations by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority aim to maintain the highest safety standards in the aviation industry.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105 under the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, addresses the Pilatus Britten-Norman BN-2 Series Aeroplanes and mandates modifications to the fuel tank sump as outlined in AD/BN-2/2. This legislation applies to all models within the specified aircraft series, ensuring adherence to the modifications described in Britten-Norman Modification No. NB/M/350. The compliance deadline is set for before 16 May 1968, making it imperative for all relevant parties to meet these safety requirements. The regulation's scope encompasses the entire Commonwealth of Australia, reinforcing the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's jurisdiction over aviation safety standards. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions within the directive, implying that all applicable aircraft must comply without exception. The application of this Act is further extended and potentially restricted through subordinate instruments, which provide additional detail and enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with the safety directives.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically in Part 39 - 105 under the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's (CASA) schedule of airworthiness directives, addresses modifications for Pilatus Britten-Norman BN-2 Series Aeroplanes, with the directive AD/BN-2/2 focusing on the fuel tank sump (section 1). This directive mandates a modification to the fuel tank sump for all models of the BN-2 series aircraft, as detailed in the Britten-Norman Modification No. NB/M/350 (section 2). The directive requires compliance with these modifications to be completed before 16 May 1968 (section 3).
Under this legislation, the primary obligation falls on aircraft owners, operators, and maintenance personnel to ensure that the specified modifications are carried out on the fuel tank sump of the BN-2 series aeroplanes. This includes adherence to the technical specifications and instructions provided in the referenced modification document (section 4). Failure to comply with these requirements can result in the aircraft being deemed non-airworthy, potentially leading to grounding of the aircraft until the required modifications are completed.
In the event of non-compliance with the airworthiness directive, the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 impose significant consequences. The primary offence under this directive is the operation of an aircraft that does not conform to the specified airworthiness standards (section 5). The penalties for breach include potential criminal charges, with a maximum penalty of up to 50 penalty units, which can be substantial given the current value of a penalty unit. Additionally, the aircraft operator may face civil penalties, including fines and other enforcement actions by CASA. Such breaches not only risk legal ramifications but also severely impact the safety and operational status of the aircraft.