CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.
CASA or its predecessors issued AD/BELL 212/38 affecting Bell 212 aircraft. CASA has reviewed this AD and as a result has cancelled it. The cancellation will become effective on 9 April 2009. No replacement AD is required.
As this AD has been cancelled because of Australia’s obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, no consultation with the Australian public has taken place on this AD cancellation. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the Manager, Systems and New Technologies in the Airworthiness Engineering Group, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, governs matters related to civil aviation within Australia, including the safety of air navigation. A key component of this legislation is the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, which outline the procedures and requirements for maintaining the airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products. Specifically, regulation 39.001 of these regulations empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for certain types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These directives are considered legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and are intended to ensure compliance with international safety standards as set out in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The objective of these regulations is to maintain and enhance the safety of air navigation through effective management of airworthiness directives. The cancellation of AD/BELL 212/38, affecting Bell 212 aircraft, is an example of CASA exercising its regulatory authority in line with Australia's international obligations, demonstrating the practical application of these legislative provisions.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, under section 39.001, empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These directives are integral to ensuring the safety and airworthiness of aircraft within the Australian jurisdiction and are issued in accordance with Australia's obligations under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The Civil Aviation Act 1988 provides the legislative foundation for these regulations, with the Governor-General having the authority to make such regulations for the safety of air navigation. Airworthiness directives serve as a key mechanism for maintaining the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, and their issuance is a responsibility shared by the State of Design and the State of Registry of an aircraft. In this instance, CASA has cancelled a specific AD (AD/BELL 212/38) affecting Bell 212 aircraft, with the cancellation set to become effective on 9 April 2009. No replacement AD is necessary, and due to the nature of this action under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, there has been no public consultation or requirement for a Regulatory Impact Statement. This legislative instrument was made by the Manager, Systems and New Technologies in the Airworthiness Engineering Group, on behalf of CASA, in line with the provisions of the Civil Aviation Act 1988.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, under section 98, empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the safety of air navigation, a task delegated to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. This regulation allows CASA to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. Notably, an AD is classified as a disallowable instrument under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and thus, it is considered a legislative instrument under section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
In accordance with Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design is tasked with the overall responsibility of ensuring the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type. This includes providing necessary information to the States of Registry to maintain airworthiness. Meanwhile, the State of Registry is responsible for the ongoing airworthiness of individual aircraft, necessitating the development or adoption of specific requirements to achieve this. CASA, under the authority of these regulations, has issued, reviewed, and subsequently cancelled AD/BELL 212/38 for Bell 212 aircraft, with the cancellation taking effect on 9 April 2009, and no replacement AD deemed necessary.
As the cancellation of the AD is a direct consequence of Australia’s obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, there has been no consultation with the Australian public regarding this cancellation. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement. The AD in question was made by the Manager, Systems and New Technologies in the Airworthiness Engineering Group on behalf of CASA, in compliance with subsection 84A(2) of the Act.
The issuance, review, and cancellation of ADs by CASA carry significant obligations and requirements. These ADs must be grounded in the safety of air navigation and aligned with international standards set forth in the Convention on International Civil Aviation. CASA's role involves ensuring that ADs are issued in a manner that maintains the safety standards expected by both national and international regulatory frameworks. The cancellation of an AD, such as AD/BELL 212/38, must be justified by compliance with international obligations and must be formally documented and communicated in accordance with established regulatory processes.
Failure to adhere to the provisions and requirements set forth by the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 can result in various civil and criminal consequences. Breaches of these regulations can lead to enforcement actions by CASA, including fines, suspension, or revocation of airworthiness certificates. The maximum penalties for non-compliance can be severe, reflecting the critical nature of ensuring air safety. For instance, individuals or entities found to be in violation of these regulations could face significant financial penalties, and in severe cases, criminal charges may be pursued, leading to imprisonment. Therefore, compliance with these legislative provisions is not only a regulatory requirement but also a matter of public safety.