CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.
CASA or its predecessors issued AD/BELL 212/19 Amendment 1 affecting Bell 212 aircraft. CASA has reviewed this AD and as a result has cancelled it. The cancellation will become effective on 9 April 2009. No replacement AD is required.
As this AD has been cancelled because of Australia’s obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, no consultation with the Australian public has taken place on this AD cancellation. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the Acting Manager, Airframe and Structures in the Airworthiness Engineering Group, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Act 1988 was enacted to establish a legal framework that ensures the safety, efficiency, and regularity of civil aviation in Australia. The Act empowers the Governor-General to make regulations that serve the interests of air navigation safety. A key component of this legislative framework is the issuance of airworthiness directives (ADs) under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, which allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to mandate safety measures for aircraft and aeronautical products. The objective is to align with Australia's international obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, particularly those concerning the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types and the dissemination of necessary safety information.
In line with these international commitments, CASA has the authority to issue, review, and, when necessary, cancel ADs. The cancellation of AD/BELL 212/19 Amendment 1 for Bell 212 aircraft, effective from 9 April 2009, reflects CASA's adherence to Australia's responsibilities under the Convention. This action was taken without public consultation as it pertains to international obligations rather than domestic policy, and it does not require a Regulatory Impact Statement. The cancellation decision was made by the Acting Manager, Airframe and Structures, in the Airworthiness Engineering Group at CASA, in accordance with the Civil Aviation Act 1988.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, supplemented by the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, governs the regulation of airworthiness directives (ADs) in Australia, ensuring that aircraft and aeronautical products maintain their airworthiness as per the safety standards set forth. Specifically, the Act empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue ADs for specified types of aircraft or aeronautical products, which are legislative instruments under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. These directives serve to communicate necessary safety measures and maintenance requirements to ensure the ongoing airworthiness of aircraft, aligning with the responsibilities of the State of Design and the State of Registry as outlined in Annex 8 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The application of these regulations extends to all aircraft registered in Australia, and CASA, as the regulatory authority, has the capacity to issue, review, and cancel ADs, as demonstrated by the recent cancellation of AD/BELL 212/19 Amendment 1 for Bell 212 aircraft, effective 9 April 2009. This action was taken in adherence to international obligations and without public consultation, as deemed appropriate under the prevailing legislative framework.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Act 1988 provides the framework under which the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR) are issued, with regulation 39.001 specifically empowering the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) (s. 98). These ADs are legislative instruments that serve as a mechanism for ensuring the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types. According to subregulation 39.001(5), ADs are disallowable instruments under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and thus, they must adhere to the requirements set forth in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (s. 6).
The obligations imposed by the Act and the accompanying regulations are significant. The State of Design, which is responsible for the aircraft type, must provide any necessary information to ensure the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft to the State of Registry (Annex 8). The State of Registry, in turn, must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft. CASA, as the regulatory body, issues ADs to fulfil these obligations, ensuring that all relevant parties are informed of any necessary actions to maintain airworthiness.
Failure to comply with ADs can result in serious consequences. Under section 84A(2) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, any non-compliance with ADs could lead to enforcement actions against the operator of the aircraft. While specific penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, non-compliance with ADs can potentially lead to administrative, civil, or criminal penalties depending on the severity and intent of the breach. The nature and extent of these penalties are subject to the broader provisions of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and other relevant legislation.
Additionally, the cancellation of an AD, such as AD/BELL 212/19 Amendment 1, must be handled in accordance with Australia's obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The explanatory statement clarifies that no public consultation or Regulatory Impact Statement was required in this instance due to the international obligations involved. This highlights the importance of aligning domestic regulatory actions with international standards and commitments.