AD/BELL 212/16 - Cyclic SCAS Stops Installation - Modification - CANCELLED

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2009L01007 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988

CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998

ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.  Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products.  Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry.  ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness.  Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.

CASA or its predecessors issued AD/BELL 212/16 affecting Bell 212 aircraft.  CASA has reviewed this AD and as a result has cancelled it.  The cancellation will become effective on 9 April 2009.  No replacement AD is required.

As this AD has been cancelled because of Australia’s obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, no consultation with the Australian public has taken place on this AD cancellation.  The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.

 

The AD has been made by the Acting Manager, Airframe and Structures in the Airworthiness Engineering Group, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.

Overview

The Civil Aviation Act 1988 was enacted to provide a comprehensive legislative framework governing civil aviation in Australia. It aims to ensure the safety of air navigation and addresses the need for regulatory oversight and safety standards in the aviation industry. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 further support this objective by providing detailed provisions for maintaining airworthiness and safety standards. Section 98 of the Act empowers the Governor-General to create regulations for the safety of air navigation, while regulation 39.001 allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives. These directives serve as a critical tool for maintaining the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, aligning with Australia’s obligations under international agreements such as Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The cancellation of a specific airworthiness directive, such as AD/BELL 212/16, reflects CASA's commitment to meeting these international standards and ensuring the safety and compliance of aircraft within Australia's jurisdiction.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Act 1988, as amended, empowers the Governor-General to enact regulations for the safety of air navigation, including the issuance of airworthiness directives. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is authorised to issue airworthiness directives for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products, with these directives being considered legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. These directives are integral to ensuring the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types, a responsibility that lies with the State of Design, which must provide necessary information to the States of Registry. The State of Registry, in turn, must ensure the ongoing airworthiness of individual aircraft by developing or adopting appropriate requirements. CASA has the authority to issue such directives, as exemplified by AD/BELL 212/16 affecting Bell 212 aircraft, which has since been reviewed and cancelled by CASA, effective from 9 April 2009, without the need for a replacement directive. This cancellation aligns with Australia’s obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation and does not require consultation with the Australian public or a Regulatory Impact Statement.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, under section 39.001, empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products, ensuring safety in air navigation. These directives, as detailed in subregulation 39.001(5), are classified as disallowable instruments under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and are thus considered legislative instruments as per section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. They play a crucial role in maintaining the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types, a responsibility that falls on the State of Design, which must provide necessary information to the State of Registry, as outlined in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The State of Registry, in turn, is tasked with ensuring the aircraft's ongoing airworthiness. CASA, adhering to its regulatory role, issued AD/BELL 212/16 concerning Bell 212 aircraft, but has since reviewed and cancelled this directive, effective 9 April 2009. The decision to cancel this AD is rooted in Australia's commitments under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, thereby obviating the need for public consultation. Furthermore, the Office of Best Practice Regulation has concluded that ADs do not necessitate a Regulatory Impact Statement, streamlining the regulatory process. The cancellation of the AD was executed by the Acting Manager, Airframe and Structures, within CASA's Airworthiness Engineering Group, in compliance with subsection 84A(2) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988. Entities and individuals governed by these regulations must ensure that any affected aircraft are compliant with the latest airworthiness directives issued by CASA. Failure to adhere to these directives can result in severe consequences, including potential grounding of the aircraft until compliance is achieved. The Civil Aviation Act 1988 and associated regulations mandate strict compliance with ADs to maintain the highest safety standards. Non-compliance can lead to enforcement actions by CASA, which may include administrative penalties, fines, and in severe cases, criminal charges. The maximum penalties for such violations are outlined in the Act and can vary depending on the nature and severity of the breach, emphasizing the critical importance of adhering to these safety directives.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Environmental Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Enforcement Powers
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.