AD/BELL 206/9 Amdt 1 - Tail Rotor Control Tube - Inspection - CANCELLED

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2008L03981 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988

CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998

ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.  Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products.  Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry.  ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness.  Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.

CASA or its predecessors issued AD/BELL 206/9 Amdt 1 affecting Bell 206 aircraft.  CASA has reviewed this AD and as a result has cancelled it.  The cancellation will become effective on 20 November 2008.  No replacement AD is required.

As this AD has been cancelled because of Australia’s obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, no consultation with the Australian public has taken place on this AD cancellation.  The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.

The AD has been made by the Manager, Systems and New Technologies in the Airworthiness Engineering Group, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.

Overview

The Civil Aviation Act 1988, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, provides the framework for ensuring the safety of civil aviation in Australia. This Act empowers the Governor-General to create regulations that are essential for the safety of air navigation. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 further elaborate on these provisions, specifically enabling the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for particular types of aircraft or aeronautical products under regulation 39.001. Such directives are critical for maintaining the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, a responsibility that is ultimately overseen by the State of Registry. The cancellation of AD/BELL 206/9 Amdt 1, which affected Bell 206 aircraft, reflects Australia's adherence to international obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, particularly those concerning the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types as stipulated in Annex 8. This cancellation, made by CASA, underscores the importance of aligning national aviation safety measures with global standards, ensuring that Australian aviation practices are both effective and internationally compliant.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) concerning specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products, which are legislative instruments that ensure safety in air navigation. These regulations apply to all aircraft registered in Australia, and to the entities responsible for the airworthiness of these aircraft, including aircraft manufacturers, operators, and maintenance providers. The geographic reach of these regulations is national, as they apply to all aircraft registered within the Commonwealth of Australia. However, the responsibilities outlined in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which Australia has ratified, also play a crucial role in the issuance and enforcement of these ADs, ensuring that international standards and practices are adhered to. The ADs are designed to maintain the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types, with the State of Registry having the primary responsibility for compliance. The Act and the Regulations do not specify exclusions or thresholds explicitly, but the application of ADs is contingent on the specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products involved. Additionally, the Act allows for the extension or restriction of the application of ADs through subordinate instruments.

Key Provisions

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the purposes of the Act, specifically with a focus on ensuring the safety of air navigation. Under this provision, regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. According to subregulation 39.001(5), these ADs are classified as disallowable instruments under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and as such, they are considered legislative instruments in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The obligations imposed by the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 under regulation 39.001 include CASA's responsibility to issue ADs that ensure the continuing airworthiness of specified aircraft types or aeronautical products. Furthermore, under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design bears the primary responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide necessary information to the appropriate States of Registry. Conversely, the State of Registry is obligated to develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft under its jurisdiction. These provisions work in tandem to uphold the safety standards required for air navigation. The Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the associated regulations do not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breaches related to the issuance or non-compliance with ADs. However, the overarching framework of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 does provide for various enforcement measures and penalties for broader breaches of civil aviation regulations. These can include fines and imprisonment, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. While the specific AD in question has been cancelled, and no public consultation was deemed necessary, any non-compliance with ADs could potentially lead to safety violations, resulting in regulatory action, fines, or other penalties as prescribed under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. In summary, the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 together establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for the issuance of airworthiness directives, aimed at ensuring the safety and continuing airworthiness of aircraft within Australia. CASA's authority to issue these directives is critical in maintaining the safety standards required by international conventions, and any non-compliance with these directives could result in serious safety and legal consequences.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.