COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Bell Helicopter Textron Canada (BHTC) 206 and Agusta Bell 206 Series Helicopters
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
AD/BELL 206/144 Rotor Mast Collective Lever 8/2000
DM
Applicability: All models with Collective lever P/N 206-010-467-001 installed.
Requirement: Action in accordance with Bell ASBs 206-00-93 Rev.A, or 206L-00-116 as appropriate.
Note: Canadian AD CF-2000-13 refers.
Compliance: Inspect within 30 days after the effective date of this directive, and modify as necessary in accordance with the Requirement Document.
This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 5 July 2000.
Background: This directive is raised to advise operators that there may be forging excess on certain collective levers which may restrict movement of the collective pitch control system.
Bernard Malcolm Hole
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 23 June 2000
The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 5 July 2000.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted in 1998, govern the safety and operational standards of civil aviation in Australia. This legislative instrument was introduced to address the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework that ensures the safety and efficiency of civil aviation activities. The Civil Aviation Regulations are administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) as the delegate of the Australian Government, with the policy objective of maintaining the highest possible level of safety in civil aviation. The specific Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/BELL 206/144 issued on 23 June 2000 under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998, highlights the commitment to rectify specific safety issues identified in certain aircraft models. This directive, which became effective on 5 July 2000, aims to address potential issues with the rotor mast collective lever in Bell Helicopter Textron Canada (BHTC) 206 and Agusta Bell 206 Series Helicopters, ensuring the safe operation of these aircraft by mandating necessary inspections and modifications as per the requirement document.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, addresses the issue of airworthiness directives for particular aircraft models, including the Bell Helicopter Textron Canada (BHTC) 206 and Agusta Bell 206 Series Helicopters. This legislation applies to all aircraft with specific parts, such as the collective lever P/N 206-010-467-001, installed within the Commonwealth of Australia. The regulation mandates that the actions detailed in the directive, which are necessary to rectify any unsafe conditions identified, must be undertaken by the aircraft operators. These actions are outlined in the requirement section and must be followed precisely as stipulated in the directive. Compliance with this directive is mandatory, with inspections and modifications needing to be completed within a specified timeframe after the directive's effective date. The directive was issued by a delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority and references a Canadian directive, highlighting the international collaboration in ensuring aviation safety standards.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically within Part 39 - 105, includes the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives. This schedule includes AD/BELL 206/144, which pertains to the Bell Helicopter Textron Canada (BHTC) 206 and Agusta Bell 206 series helicopters. The AD focuses on the rotor mast collective lever and requires certain actions to address a potential safety issue identified in the background section (section 1). The AD, issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, mandates specific actions to correct the unsafe condition identified. The applicability section specifies that all models with the collective lever P/N 206-010-467-001 installed are subject to this directive (section 2). The requirement section outlines the necessary action, which is to follow the instructions set out in Bell ASBs 206-00-93 Rev.A, or 206L-00-116, as appropriate, to ensure the collective pitch control system operates without restriction (section 3). The compliance section mandates that an inspection must be conducted within 30 days of the directive's effective date, and any necessary modifications must be made according to the requirement document (section 4).
Operators of the affected helicopters are obligated to ensure that the specified collective levers are inspected and modified as necessary, in accordance with the requirements outlined in the Airworthiness Directive. This involves adherence to the instructions provided in the relevant Bell Airworthiness Service Bulletins. The directive emphasises the importance of timely action, with the inspection to be completed within 30 days of the AD's effective date of 5 July 2000. Failure to comply with the AD may result in safety risks, as the directive addresses a potential restriction in the movement of the collective pitch control system, which is critical for the safe operation of the helicopter (section 5).
The Airworthiness Directive does not explicitly state specific offences, penalties, or consequences for non-compliance within the text provided. However, non-compliance with CASA directives generally can lead to significant civil and criminal penalties under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998. These can include fines, suspension or revocation of airworthiness certificates, and potential criminal charges for individuals responsible for non-compliance, depending on the severity of the safety issue and the impact on aviation safety (section 6). The maximum penalties for non-compliance with CASA directives can vary widely but may include substantial fines and imprisonment, reflecting the serious nature of aviation safety regulations.