COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Bell Helicopter Textron 205 Series Helicopters
AD/BELL 205/19
Amdt 1
Transmission Support Case - Inspection 7/74
Applicability: All model 205.
Requirement: Visually inspect the two lift link attachment lugs on the transmission main support case for cracking.
Compliance: At intervals not exceeding 100 hours time in service after 17 July 1974.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, were enacted to provide comprehensive regulations concerning aviation safety in Australia. These regulations cover a wide range of safety requirements, including those pertaining to the airworthiness of aircraft. The specific legislative instrument, F2006B04360, is an amendment to Part 39, Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, addressing the Bell Helicopter Textron 205 Series Helicopters. The amendment, AD/BELL 205/19 Amendment 1, focuses on the inspection of the transmission support case, specifically the two lift link attachment lugs, to ensure they are free from cracking. This directive was introduced to mitigate safety risks associated with potential structural failure in the transmission support case, thereby enhancing the overall safety standards in civil aviation operations. The policy objective of this amendment is to ensure that aircraft maintain their airworthiness and safety by adhering to the specified inspection intervals, in this case, every 100 hours of time in service following the amendment's implementation date of 17 July 1974.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105 under the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, mandates that all Bell Helicopter Textron 205 series helicopters must undergo regular inspections of the transmission support case. This requirement applies universally to all model 205 helicopters and pertains to a visual inspection of the two lift link attachment lugs on the transmission main support case for any signs of cracking. This directive is designed to ensure the ongoing airworthiness of the aircraft and enhance flight safety. The inspection must be conducted at intervals not exceeding 100 hours of time in service following the issuance of the directive on 17 July 1974. This regulation applies across the Commonwealth of Australia, underscoring the national scope of its enforcement by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. The regulations do not specify any exclusions or exemptions but set clear thresholds for compliance through this amendment.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, which pertains to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, require that all Bell Helicopter Textron 205 Series Helicopters undergo a visual inspection of the two lift link attachment lugs on the transmission main support case. This inspection (AD/BELL 205/19) is mandated to check for any signs of cracking. This requirement is applicable to all models within the Bell 205 series, and the inspection must be conducted at intervals not exceeding 100 hours of time in service after 17 July 1974.
The obligations imposed by this directive are straightforward but critical for maintaining airworthiness. Operators of Bell 205 Series Helicopters must ensure that the specified visual inspections are conducted by qualified personnel. They must maintain records of these inspections to demonstrate compliance with the Airworthiness Directive. Furthermore, any identified issues, such as cracking in the lift link attachment lugs, must be addressed according to the manufacturer's recommendations or other approved methods, to maintain the safety and airworthiness of the aircraft.
Failure to comply with the requirements set out in this Airworthiness Directive may lead to significant consequences. Under the Civil Aviation Regulations, non-compliance can result in enforcement actions against the operator, which can include fines or other penalties. While specific penalties are not detailed in the text, they could range from civil penalties to more severe criminal charges depending on the severity and impact of the non-compliance. The overarching goal is to ensure that the safety and airworthiness of the aircraft are upheld, which is paramount in civil aviation operations.