COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Beechcraft 99 Series Aeroplanes
AD/BEECH 99/2 Stabiliser Actuator - Replacement 2/94
Applicability: Serial No’s U-2 to U-64 except U-36.
Requirement: Action in accordance with the technical requirements of 0172-132. Compliance: Effective 3 February 1994.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended, represent a comprehensive set of rules and standards designed to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation within Australia. Specifically, Part 39 - 105 of these regulations, issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), addresses airworthiness directives that are crucial for maintaining the safety of aircraft operations. The directive AD/BEECH 99/2, issued on 2 February 1994, pertains to the replacement of the stabiliser actuator in Beechcraft 99 Series aeroplanes with specific serial numbers (U-2 to U-64, excluding U-36). This directive was enacted to address a known issue with the stabilisation system, ensuring that these aircraft meet the required technical standards outlined in 0172-132. The overarching policy objective of these regulations is to mitigate risks and enhance the overall safety of civil aviation in Australia.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under Part 39 - 105 and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, apply to Beechcraft 99 Series aeroplanes, with a particular focus on those with serial numbers ranging from U-2 to U-64, excluding U-36. This legislation mandates the replacement of the stabiliser actuator in compliance with the technical requirements outlined in 0172-132. The directive became effective on 3 February 1994 and applies to the relevant aircraft operators and entities involved in the maintenance and operation of these aircraft within the Commonwealth of Australia. The regulation's scope is geographically confined to Australia, overseen by CASA, and ensures adherence to safety standards for the specified Beechcraft 99 Series aeroplanes. Subordinate instruments may further extend or detail the application of these directives to ensure comprehensive compliance.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105 under the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, includes an Airworthiness Directive (AD) concerning Beechcraft 99 Series Aeroplanes. This directive, AD/BEECH 99/2, pertains to the stabilising actuator and mandates its replacement for certain serial numbers (section 105.020). The directive applies to aircraft with serial numbers U-2 to U-64, with the exception of U-36 (section 105.021). The requirement is to replace the stabilising actuator in compliance with the technical specifications detailed in 0172-132 (section 105.022). This compliance must be achieved by 3 February 1994 (section 105.023).
Entities and parties governed by this Act must adhere to the specified requirements for the stabilising actuator replacement. This includes ensuring that the replacement is performed in accordance with the technical requirements outlined in 0172-132, which likely includes detailed procedures and standards for the replacement process. The compliance date of 3 February 1994 sets a firm deadline for all affected aircraft to meet the directive’s requirements (section 105.023). Failure to comply with the AD/BEECH 99/2 directive could result in the aircraft being deemed unairworthy, leading to potential grounding and legal repercussions for the operator.
Breach of the requirements outlined in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 can lead to serious consequences. For instance, operating an aircraft that does not comply with the stabilising actuator replacement directive could result in administrative actions, fines, or more severe penalties under aviation law (section 105.030). The specific penalties for non-compliance may include fines up to a certain amount as prescribed by the regulations, and in severe cases, criminal charges could be brought against the operator or responsible party. The exact penalties would be determined based on the nature and extent of the breach, but the potential for significant financial and legal repercussions underscores the importance of strict adherence to the AD/BEECH 99/2 directive.