COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Beechcraft 65 and 70 (Queen Air) Series Aeroplanes
AD/BEECH 65/50
Amdt 1
Applicability: All models 65 and 70.
Wheel Well Fuel Lines 3/89
Requirement: Replace all aluminium fuel lines upstream of the fuel selector valve in each main landing gear wheel well with lines fabricated from stainless steel.
Note: This requirement does not include the large diameter fuel tank interconnect line situated in the aft section of the wheel wells.
Compliance: Before 1 July 1979.
Background: In the event of an uncontained engine compartment fire it is known that flames will be directed by the slipstream into the main landing gear wheel wells, through which unprotected aluminium fuel lines of small diameter are located. Should any line burn through upstream of the fuel selector valve, an uncontrollable amount of fuel will be added to the fire and the integrity of the wing main spar will be endangered. In order to reduce this threat the aluminium fuel lines are to be replaced with those of stainless steel.
This amendment consolidates Queen Air 65 and 70 series aircraft. Previous compliance with AD/BEECH 70/21 is equivalent compliance with this AD.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, address the issue of aircraft safety through the issuance of Airworthiness Directives (ADs) by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). The AD/BEECH 65/50 Amendment 1, which was introduced to mitigate the risks associated with fuel line failure in Beechcraft 65 and 70 (Queen Air) series aeroplanes, exemplifies this commitment. The primary problem addressed by this AD is the vulnerability of the aluminium fuel lines located in the main landing gear wheel wells of these aircraft models to burn through during an uncontained engine compartment fire, potentially exacerbating the fire and compromising the structural integrity of the wing. The policy objective is to enhance the safety of these aircraft by mandating the replacement of these aluminium fuel lines with stainless steel ones, thereby reducing the risk of catastrophic fuel line failure and fire spread.
This legislative instrument was enacted to provide a standardised approach to ensuring the airworthiness of Beechcraft 65 and 70 series aircraft by requiring compliance with specific safety measures. The requirement to replace aluminium fuel lines with stainless steel ones before 1 July 1979 aims to prevent the dangerous consequences of fuel line failure in the event of a fire, thereby safeguarding both the aircraft and its occupants.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, mandates the implementation of airworthiness directives issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. This particular regulation, AD/BEECH 65/50 Amendment 1, applies to all models of Beechcraft 65 and 70 (Queen Air) series aeroplanes. The directive requires the replacement of all aluminium fuel lines upstream of the fuel selector valve in each main landing gear wheel well with lines fabricated from stainless steel, a requirement that does not include the large diameter fuel tank interconnect line situated in the aft section of the wheel wells. The compliance deadline for this directive was before 1 July 1979. This directive aims to mitigate the risk of uncontained engine fires by ensuring that in the event of such an incident, flames directed by the slipstream into the main landing gear wheel wells will not burn through unprotected aluminium fuel lines, thereby preventing an uncontrollable release of fuel that could endanger the integrity of the wing main spar. The directive consolidates previous requirements for Queen Air 65 and 70 series aircraft, with compliance to AD/BEECH 70/21 considered equivalent to compliance with this AD. The regulation extends its application nationally, affecting aircraft operators, maintenance providers, and relevant aviation authorities within Australia.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, Part 39, Section 105, specifically addresses the airworthiness directives for Beechcraft 65 and 70 (Queen Air) series aeroplanes through Amendment 1. This amendment, denoted as AD/BEECH 65/50, applies to all models of the 65 and 70 series aircraft. The key requirement outlined in this directive is the replacement of all aluminium fuel lines located upstream of the fuel selector valve in each main landing gear wheel well with lines fabricated from stainless steel (Section 105). This directive does not include the large diameter fuel tank interconnect line situated in the aft section of the wheel wells.
Compliance with this airworthiness directive is mandated for all models of the Beechcraft 65 and 70 series aircraft, with an application date of before 1 July 1979. The directive aims to address a significant safety concern: the risk of uncontained engine compartment fires directing flames into the main landing gear wheel wells. If an unprotected aluminium fuel line burns through upstream of the fuel selector valve, it could lead to an uncontrollable amount of fuel being added to the fire, thereby endangering the integrity of the wing main spar. By replacing the aluminium fuel lines with stainless steel ones, the directive seeks to mitigate this risk.
Entities and individuals governed by this airworthiness directive must ensure that all specified aluminium fuel lines are replaced with stainless steel lines as mandated. The compliance date of before 1 July 1979 sets a clear timeline for when these modifications must be completed. Non-compliance with this directive could potentially result in severe safety hazards, including the risk of catastrophic aircraft failure due to fire-related incidents.
In terms of penalties and consequences, while the specific Civil Aviation Regulations do not explicitly state penalties for non-compliance with this airworthiness directive, failure to adhere to such directives can lead to significant civil or criminal consequences under broader aviation safety regulations. This may include fines, operational restrictions, or even criminal charges if the non-compliance results in an accident or endangers public safety. The severity of these penalties can vary depending on the specific circumstances and the discretion of the regulatory authorities.