AD/BEECH 65/1 - Rudder Torque Tube Lowering Fitting - Inspection - CANCELLED

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2008L01610 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988

CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998

ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.  Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products.  Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry.  ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness.  Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.  When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.

CASA issued AD/BEECH 65/1, affecting Beech 65 model aircraft in 1964.  CASA has reviewed this AD and as a result has decided to cancel it.  The cancellation will become effective on 5 June 2008.  No replacement AD is required, as the requirements of this AD are covered by the manufacturer’s maintenance manual and normal maintenance practices.

No consultation with the Australian public has taken place on this AD cancellation, because the cancellation results in a reduction of the regulatory burden.  The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.

 

The AD has been made by the Manager, Airframes in the Airworthiness Engineering Branch, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Act 1988 was enacted to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for civil aviation in Australia, focusing primarily on ensuring the safety and efficiency of air navigation. This Act empowers the Governor-General to create regulations that serve the interests of air navigation safety, delegating specific enforcement responsibilities to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). A notable mechanism under this Act is the issuance of airworthiness directives (ADs) as stipulated in the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, which CASA can implement for particular types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These directives serve as legislative instruments that mandate compliance with airworthiness standards, aligning with international obligations under ICAO Annex 8. The Civil Aviation Act 1988 thus aims to maintain high safety standards in Australia's civil aviation sector by ensuring that aircraft meet rigorous airworthiness criteria. In accordance with the Act, CASA issued AD/BEECH 65/1 concerning Beech 65 model aircraft in 1964. After thorough review, CASA has decided to cancel this directive, effective from 5 June 2008, due to the coverage of its requirements by the manufacturer's maintenance manual and standard maintenance practices. This cancellation reflects a reduction in regulatory burden without necessitating a replacement AD. No public consultation was required for this cancellation, as it was determined by the Office of Best Practice Regulation that such ADs do not necessitate a Regulatory Impact Statement. The decision to cancel the AD was made by the Manager, Airframes in the Airworthiness Engineering Branch, on behalf of CASA, in compliance with the legislative requirements of the Civil Aviation Act 1988.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products to ensure the safety of air navigation. These directives are legislative instruments subject to disallowance and review under relevant Acts. The State of Design is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, providing necessary information to the State of Registry, which must then ensure the aircraft's ongoing compliance with safety standards. CASA, as Australia's national airworthiness authority, evaluates the information from the State of Design and issues Australian ADs as necessary. For instance, CASA previously issued AD/BEECH 65/1 for Beech 65 model aircraft in 1964, which has now been cancelled as the requisite safety measures are already addressed in the manufacturer's maintenance manual and standard maintenance practices. This cancellation reflects a reduction in regulatory burden and has been determined not to require a Regulatory Impact Statement. The AD was issued by the Manager, Airframes in the Airworthiness Engineering Branch on behalf of CASA, in accordance with the Civil Aviation Act 1988.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Act 1988, particularly under section 98, allows the Governor-General to establish regulations aimed at ensuring the safety of air navigation. This authority is exercised through the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, where regulation 39.001 grants the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) the power to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These ADs, as outlined in subregulation 39.001(5), are considered disallowable instruments under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and thus, they are legislative instruments as per section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The obligations imposed by the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 are significant for entities involved in civil aviation. CASA, as the national airworthiness authority, must ensure that any AD issued by a State of Design is assessed and, if deemed necessary, implemented as an Australian AD. This ensures that all aircraft registered in Australia meet the required safety standards. Additionally, the State of Registry is mandated to develop or adopt necessary requirements to maintain the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, in line with Annex 8 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation. This places a responsibility on both the State of Design and the State of Registry to collaborate in maintaining the airworthiness of aircraft types. Failure to comply with the requirements set out in ADs can lead to various consequences. Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 establish that non-compliance with ADs can result in enforcement actions, which may include fines or other penalties. The exact penalties are determined based on the severity of the breach and are stipulated in relevant sections of the Civil Aviation Act 1988. It is also worth noting that the Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement, simplifying the process for regulatory adjustments aimed at maintaining safety standards. In a specific case, CASA issued AD/BEECH 65/1, which affected Beech 65 model aircraft manufactured in 1964. After reviewing the directive, CASA decided to cancel AD/BEECH 65/1, effective from 5 June 2008. This decision was made because the requirements of the AD were adequately covered by the manufacturer’s maintenance manual and normal maintenance practices, thus reducing the regulatory burden. No consultation with the Australian public was necessary for this cancellation, as it was deemed a reduction in regulatory requirements rather than an introduction of new ones. The AD was made by the Manager, Airframes in the Airworthiness Engineering Branch, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A(2) of the Act.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.