AD/BEECH 56/29 - Elevator Control Fittings

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B04060 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 


Beechcraft 56TC (Turbo Baron) Series Aeroplanes

 

AD/BEECH 56/29 Elevator Control Fittings 12/89

Applicability: Models 56TC with S/Nos TG-2 through TG-83.

 

Requirement: 1. Determine the composition (aluminium or magnesium) of the elevator control fittings in accordance with Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 2242 Revision

  1. If the fittings are determined to be aluminium, no further action is required by this Directive.

 

2.    If the fittings are determined to be magnesium, visually inspect in accordance with Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 2242 Revision 1. Cracked fittings are to be replaced with aluminium fittings before further flight.

 

Note 1: The installation of aluminium fittings is considered terminating action for this Directive.

 

Note 2: FAA AD 89-05-02 refers.

 

Compliance:  1. Prior to exceeding 100 hours’ time in service after 30 November 1989, or at the next scheduled inspection for issue of Maintenance Release after 30 November 1989, whichever occurs later.

 

2. Prior to exceeding 100 hours’ time in service after 30 November 1989, or at the next scheduled inspection for issue of Maintenance Release after 30 November 1989, whichever occurs later, and thereafter at intervals not exceeding 100 hours’ time in service, until aluminium fittings are installed.

 

Background: Country of origin AD. The FAA has received reports of cracking and also failure of magnesium elevator control fittings. In-flight failure could result in loss of the aircraft.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Australian Government, aim to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation within Australia. Specifically, Part 39 - 105 of these regulations, which includes the Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, governs the airworthiness of aircraft by issuing directives to address identified safety concerns. One such directive, AD/BEECH 56/29, was introduced to address the problem of potential cracking and failure of magnesium elevator control fittings in Beechcraft 56TC (Turbo Baron) Series Aeroplanes. This directive was developed in response to reports from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regarding similar issues, aiming to prevent in-flight failures that could lead to catastrophic outcomes. The policy objective is to mandate inspections and replacements of these fittings to maintain the airworthiness of the affected aircraft models.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, under Part 39 - 105, specifically address the airworthiness of Beechcraft 56TC (Turbo Baron) Series Aeroplanes through the Schedule of Airworthiness Directives. This regulation is pertinent to models 56TC with serial numbers ranging from TG-2 to TG-83, focusing on the composition and inspection of elevator control fittings. The directive mandates a determination of whether these fittings are made of aluminium or magnesium and stipulates actions based on the findings. If the fittings are aluminium, no further action is required, whereas if they are magnesium, a visual inspection must be conducted in accordance with Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 2242 Revision 1, with cracked fittings needing replacement with aluminium fittings before further flight. Compliance with this directive must occur prior to exceeding 100 hours’ time in service after 30 November 1989, or at the next scheduled inspection for the issue of a Maintenance Release after that date, and subsequently at intervals not exceeding 100 hours’ time in service until the installation of aluminium fittings is completed. The directive extends its application nationally and is supported by the Federal Aviation Administration's AD 89-05-02.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under Part 39 - 105 and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, detail requirements for the maintenance of Beechcraft 56TC (Turbo Baron) Series Aeroplanes. In particular, AD/BEECH 56/29 pertains to elevator control fittings. The directive applies to models 56TC with serial numbers ranging from TG-2 to TG-83. According to Section 1, operators must determine the composition of the elevator control fittings to ascertain whether they are made of aluminium or magnesium. If the fittings are aluminium, no further action is required under this directive. However, if they are magnesium, a visual inspection must be conducted in accordance with Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 2242 Revision 1. Any cracked magnesium fittings must be replaced with aluminium fittings before the aircraft can be flown again. The obligations imposed by this directive are clear and require operators to take specific actions. Firstly, operators must ensure that the composition of the elevator control fittings is determined. If the fittings are found to be magnesium, they must then be visually inspected for any cracks. If any cracks are found, the defective magnesium fittings must be replaced with aluminium ones before the aircraft is flown further. This inspection and potential replacement must occur before the aircraft accumulates 100 hours of service time after 30 November 1989, or at the next scheduled inspection for the issue of a Maintenance Release, whichever is later. Furthermore, these inspections and any necessary replacements must be carried out at intervals not exceeding 100 hours of service time until the aluminium fittings are installed. Failure to comply with the provisions of AD/BEECH 56/29 can lead to serious consequences. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has reported instances of cracking and failure of magnesium elevator control fittings, which could potentially result in the loss of the aircraft in-flight. While the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 do not explicitly state the penalties for non-compliance with this specific directive, breaches of airworthiness directives generally can result in severe penalties. These may include fines, the grounding of the aircraft, and in serious cases, criminal charges against responsible individuals or entities. The exact penalties may vary depending on the specific circumstances and the discretion of the court.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Compliance Obligations
Enforcement Powers
Catchwords
Airworthiness Directives

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.