COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Beechcraft 55, 58 and 95-55 (Baron) Series Aeroplanes
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
AD/BEECH 55/86 Magnesium Metal Bonded Elevator Assembly
Applicability: Model Serial Number
13/2000
95-A55 TC-191 through TC-349, TC-351 through TC-370, TC-372 through TC- 501
95-B55 TC-371 and TC-502 through TC-2406
95-C55 TC-350, TE-1 through TE-49, and TE-51 through TE-451 D55 TE-452 through TE-767
E55 TE-768 through TE-1201
58 TH-1 through TH-1930
58P TJ-3 through TJ-435, and TJ-437 through TJ-443 58TC TK-1 through TK-150
Requirement: Action in accordance with Raytheon Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 27-3396, Issued May 2000, Revised June 2000.
Note: FAA AD 2000-18-02 Amdt 39-11887 refers.
Compliance: Accomplish, before 28 January 2001, the check to determine whether an affected elevator skin assembly is installed. Replace, before further flight, any elevator skin assembly found to be affected.
This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 28 December 2000.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Background: The FAA received reports that certain elevator skin assemblies did not receive a 250 degree Fahrenheit bake operation after corrosion treatment; thus making the skin susceptible to separation from the elevator assembly. Static strength capability is reduced due to the bond degradation, and continued operation could result in skin separation with potential aircraft flutter, and consequent loss of control of the aircraft.
David Alan Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 7 November 2000
The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 22 November 2000.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Australian Parliament, aims to ensure the safety of civil aviation operations in Australia. In addressing potential safety concerns identified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regarding specific elevator skin assemblies on Beechcraft 55, 58, and 95-55 (Baron) series aeroplanes, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) issued Airworthiness Directive AD/BEECH 55/86 on 28 December 2000. This directive mandates that all affected aircraft must undergo a check to determine if their elevator skin assemblies are installed correctly, with any affected assemblies to be replaced before further flight. The directive was issued in response to reports that certain elevator skin assemblies did not receive a necessary 250-degree Fahrenheit bake operation after corrosion treatment, which could lead to skin separation and potential loss of control of the aircraft. The policy objective is to mitigate the risk of in-flight flutter and ensure the continued airworthiness of the specified aircraft models.
Scope and Application
The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 applies specifically to Beechcraft 55, 58, and 95-55 (Baron) series aeroplanes, identified by their respective model and serial numbers. The directive mandates that the action set out in the requirement section must be taken to rectify an identified unsafe condition. This action involves checking and, if necessary, replacing the magnesium metal bonded elevator assembly as per the instructions in Raytheon Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 27-3396, issued in May 2000. The directive applies to aircraft within the specified serial number ranges and requires compliance before further flight. The AD, which becomes effective on 28 December 2000, mandates that the required checks and actions must be completed by 28 January 2001. The directive extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, enforced by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, and applies nationally, ensuring the safety and airworthiness of the specified aircraft models.
Key Provisions
The main sections of this Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (CAR) Airworthiness Directive (AD) are the applicability (1), requirement (2), and compliance (3) sections. The AD applies to Beechcraft 55, 58, and 95-55 (Baron) series aeroplanes with specified model and serial numbers (1). It mandates that elevator skin assemblies which did not receive a 250 degree Fahrenheit bake operation after corrosion treatment be checked and, if affected, replaced (2). The action must be completed before further flight and, for most affected aircraft, before 28 January 2001 (3). The AD requires that the specified Beechcraft aeroplanes undergo checks and repairs to elevator skin assemblies to prevent potential skin separation, which could lead to loss of control (1). Operators of these aircraft must follow the instructions in Raytheon Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 27-3396 (May 2000, revised June 2000) to identify and replace affected elevator skin assemblies (2). Failure to comply with the AD by the specified deadlines may result in the aircraft being considered unairworthy, which could prevent it from flying until the required actions are taken (3). The AD specifies that operators of the affected aircraft must ensure that elevator skin assemblies are checked and replaced if necessary, in accordance with the AD's requirements and timeline (1). Non-compliance with the AD could result in the aircraft being grounded until the required checks and repairs are completed (2). The AD does not explicitly state penalties for non-compliance, but failure to comply could lead to the aircraft being deemed unairworthy, potentially resulting in legal and financial consequences for the operator (3).