COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Beechcraft 55, 58 and 95-55 (Baron) Series Aeroplanes
AD/BEECH 55/10
Amdt 2
Elevator Trim Tab System 7/75
Applicability: All models as listed in the Requirement Document. Requirement: Action in accordance with Beechcraft SI No. 0610-152, Rev. 2. Compliance: As detailed in the Requirement Document.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Commonwealth of Australia, are a comprehensive set of rules governing civil aviation in the country. Specifically, Part 39 - 105 of these regulations pertains to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's (CASA) schedule of airworthiness directives, which are legally binding orders that mandate the correction of an airworthiness issue on an aircraft. One such directive, AD/BEECH 55/10 Amendment 2, addresses the elevator trim tab system for Beechcraft 55, 58, and 95-55 (Baron) Series Aeroplanes. This directive was introduced to ensure that all applicable models comply with Beechcraft Service Information No. 0610-152, Revision 2, to rectify identified safety issues. The overarching policy objective of such regulations is to maintain and enhance the safety standards of civil aviation, ensuring the protection of passengers, crew, and the general public.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, under the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, pertains specifically to the Beechcraft 55, 58 and 95-55 (Baron) Series Aeroplanes, as detailed in AD/BEECH 55/10 Amendment 2 concerning the Elevator Trim Tab System. This legislative instrument applies to all models specified in the Requirement Document, mandating compliance with the actions outlined in Beechcraft Service Information Notice No. 0610-152, Revision 2. The scope of this regulation is designed to ensure that the specified aircraft maintain the required airworthiness standards, thereby enhancing flight safety. While the regulation is applicable to the mentioned Beechcraft models, any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds are to be found within the Requirement Document itself, which details the compliance measures necessary to address the specified issue with the elevator trim tab system. The applicability of this directive is governed by the Commonwealth of Australia, extending its jurisdictional reach to ensure uniformity and safety across all relevant civil aviation activities.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, particularly Part 39, includes specific airworthiness directives for certain aircraft models, such as the Beechcraft 55, 58, and 95-55 (Baron) Series Aeroplanes. The directive AD/BEECH 55/10 Amendment 2, issued on 7 July 2015, pertains to the elevator trim tab system (section 39-105). This directive applies to all models specified in the Requirement Document and mandates actions in accordance with Beechcraft Service Instruction No. 0610-152, Revision 2. Compliance with these directives is expected as outlined in the Requirement Document, which details the necessary actions to ensure the elevator trim tab system is maintained and functioning properly.
The obligations imposed by this directive are significant for aircraft operators and maintenance personnel. They are required to adhere strictly to the specified actions detailed in the Requirement Document and the referenced Beechcraft Service Instruction. This ensures that the elevator trim tab system is correctly maintained, which is crucial for the safe operation of the aircraft. Failure to comply with these directives can lead to severe consequences, including potential safety risks and legal repercussions for the operators and maintenance staff.
Breaching the requirements set out in these directives can result in serious civil and criminal consequences. Under the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, non-compliance with airworthiness directives can lead to penalties. The specific penalties depend on the severity of the breach, but they can include substantial fines. For instance, the maximum penalty for a serious breach can be up to $200,000 for a corporation, or $40,000 for an individual. Furthermore, criminal charges may be pursued in cases of gross negligence or wilful default, which could result in imprisonment. These severe consequences underscore the importance of strict adherence to the outlined directives to maintain the highest standards of aviation safety.