AD/BEECH 50/34 - Beechcraft Forward Elevator Cable - Replacement

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2012L00042 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988

CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998

ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.  Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products.  Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry.  ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness.  Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.  When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.

CASA has raised AD/BEECH 50/34 to correct an unsafe situation on Beechcraft 50 series aircraft.  Failure of the forward elevator cable can place the elevator firmly in the full ‘down’ position due to system spring tension.

This Directive requires immediate inspection of the forward elevator cable and replacement for elevator cables over 15 years old.  The AD requires continuing inspections of the entire elevator control system to preclude the unanticipated failure of the elevator flight control system which may result in loss of control of the aircraft.

The Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America has not yet taken action to correct this unsafe condition.  As there are several examples of the type on the Australian register, CASA has developed an AD to correct the problem on Australian aircraft.

CASA has had limited consultation with the Australian industry and public, however due to the urgency of the situation it is necessary that immediate action is taken.  Failure of the forward elevator control cable can lead to loss of control of the aircraft.

The Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.


Compatibility with human rights and freedoms

This instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Human Rights Implications

The instrument sets out technical requirements as detailed above.  The instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Conclusion

The instrument is compatible with human rights and freedoms.

The AD has been made by the Executive Manager, Standards Development and New Technology Division on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 94 (1) of the Act.

Overview

The Civil Aviation Act 1988 was enacted to establish a regulatory framework for ensuring the safety of civil aviation in Australia. It was introduced to address the need for comprehensive aviation regulations that ensure the safety of air navigation and the continued airworthiness of aircraft. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 further detail the procedures and requirements under the Act. The Civil Aviation (Safety) Regulations 1998 were enacted by the Governor-General under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and aim to ensure that all aspects of civil aviation in Australia comply with safety standards. One significant aspect of these regulations is the issuance of airworthiness directives, which are legislative instruments under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. These directives are critical for maintaining the safety of aircraft, particularly in response to unsafe conditions identified by the State of Design or other international civil aviation authorities. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is responsible for issuing these directives when necessary, ensuring that Australian aircraft meet safety standards and comply with international obligations.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation (Airworthiness Directive) Regulations 1998 apply to all aircraft and aeronautical products in Australia, with a focus on ensuring the continuing airworthiness of these entities. This applies to both the State of Design, which has the responsibility for the initial airworthiness of an aircraft type, and the State of Registry, which ensures the ongoing airworthiness of individual aircraft within its jurisdiction. The regulations are established under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, with the Australian Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) as the national airworthiness authority mandated to assess and issue airworthiness directives (ADs) as necessary. ADs are legislative instruments that can be issued to address unsafe situations and are required to be assessed and potentially adopted as Australian ADs when issued by a State of Design against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register. In this case, CASA issued AD/BEECH 50/34 to address an unsafe condition on Beechcraft 50 series aircraft where failure of the forward elevator cable could result in a full ‘down’ position of the elevator, leading to potential loss of control. This AD mandates immediate inspection and replacement of the forward elevator cable and continuing inspections of the entire elevator control system for aircraft with cables over 15 years old.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Act 1988 (section 98) empowers the Governor-General to enact regulations that ensure the safety of air navigation. Regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. According to subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, an AD is classified as a disallowable instrument under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and is considered a legislative instrument under section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The AD/BEECH 50/34 mandates immediate inspection of the forward elevator cable on Beechcraft 50 series aircraft and requires replacement of elevator cables older than 15 years. It also requires ongoing inspections of the entire elevator control system to prevent unanticipated failures that could result in a loss of control. This directive was issued due to an unsafe condition identified by CASA, which has not yet been addressed by the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States. Given the urgency of the situation and the presence of several Beechcraft 50 series aircraft on the Australian register, CASA has taken swift action to ensure safety. Entities governed by the AD must comply with the specified inspection and replacement requirements within the stipulated timeframes. These obligations are designed to ensure that the aircraft remain airworthy and safe to operate. Failure to comply with the AD could result in the aircraft being deemed unairworthy, which could lead to grounding and potential legal consequences for the aircraft operator. CASA has determined that the urgency of the situation does not require a Regulatory Impact Statement, and the AD is compatible with human rights and freedoms as it does not engage any applicable rights or freedoms. Failure to comply with the provisions of the AD can lead to serious safety risks. The AD mandates strict inspection and replacement requirements for the forward elevator cable and ongoing inspections of the elevator control system. Non-compliance could result in the aircraft being deemed unairworthy, leading to potential grounding and enforcement actions. The AD is designed to prevent the risk of loss of control due to cable failure, which could have catastrophic consequences. The AD was made by the Executive Manager, Standards Development and New Technology Division on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 94(1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Environmental Law
Commercial Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Compliance Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.