AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below revokes Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/BEECH 35/67 and issues the following AD under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
Beechcraft 35 (Bonanza) Series Aeroplanes
AD/BEECH 35/67
Amdt 1
Wing Bolt, Nut and Fitting 2/2002
Applicability: All models.
Requirement: 1. Remove and inspect wing bolts, washers, nuts and fittings in accordance with Beechcraft Shop Manual 35-590096B18 Section 4 or Maintenance Manual 36- 590001-9A17 Section 57-00-00.
2. Retire wing bolts, washers and nuts from service and replace with new hardware in accordance with Beechcraft Shop Manual 35-590096B18 Section 4 or Maintenance Manual 36-590001-9A17 Section 57-00-00. Render unserviceable all hardware retired.
Note: The bolt torque should be checked before replacement to confirm bolt has been torqued to correct value. If the torque value is incorrect, other maintenance action may be required.
Compliance: 1. Unless inspection has already been accomplished in accordance with the Requirement Document, initially inspect before 5 calendar years from initial installation, or within 100 hours time in service after 1 February 1996, whichever occurs later. Re-inspect at intervals not to exceed 5 calendar years.
2. Retire before 15 calendar years after initial installation, or within 100 hours time in service after 1 February 1996, whichever occurs later.
Where date of initial installation is unknown, the date of manufacture of the aircraft must be used for paragraphs 1 and 2.
This amendment becomes effective on 21 February 2002.
Background: This AD makes mandatory the inspection and replacement periods for the wing attachment hardware detailed in the Requirement Document.
Amdt 1 - Adds the Note to Requirement 2 and adds the fittings as an item to be inspected when the wing bolts, washers and nuts are removed and inspected.
Beechcraft 35 (Bonanza) Series Aeroplanes
AD/BEECH 35/67 Amdt 1 (continued)
The original issue of this Airworthiness Directive became effective on 1 February 1996.
Eugene Paul Holzapfel
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 3 January 2002
The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 30 January 2002.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) introduced the Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/BEECH 35/67 Amdt 1 to address safety concerns related to the wing attachment hardware of Beechcraft 35 (Bonanza) series aeroplanes. This legislative instrument, enacted in 2002, mandates specific inspection and replacement periods for the wing bolts, washers, nuts, and fittings, which are crucial for the structural integrity of the aircraft. By requiring the removal, inspection, and replacement of these components, the AD aims to mitigate the risk of unsafe conditions that could compromise the airworthiness of the aircraft. This directive is issued under subregulation 39.1(1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, reflecting CASA's commitment to maintaining high safety standards in the aviation industry.
Scope and Application
The Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/BEECH 35/67 applies to all models of Beechcraft 35 (Bonanza) Series Aeroplanes. It mandates specific inspection and replacement requirements for wing bolts, washers, nuts, and fittings to ensure the safety of these aircraft. The directive, issued by the delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, stipulates that inspections must be conducted within certain timeframes following the aircraft's initial installation or manufacture, and replacements must be carried out within specified intervals to prevent unsafe conditions. The AD is applicable throughout the Commonwealth of Australia, as indicated by its notification in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette. It is important to note that the AD supersedes the previous directive AD/BEECH 35/67, which became effective on 1 February 1996, and includes an amendment that adds a note regarding bolt torque and the inclusion of fittings in the inspection process. This AD is a critical regulatory measure designed to maintain the airworthiness of the specified aircraft models.
Key Provisions
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) concerns the inspection and replacement of wing bolts, washers, nuts, and fittings for all models of Beechcraft 35 (Bonanza) Series Aeroplanes. Section 2 of the AD sets out the requirement for the action to be taken, which includes inspecting and retiring the specified hardware from service and replacing it with new parts. Section 3 details the compliance timeline, stipulating that the initial inspection should occur before 5 calendar years from the initial installation or within 100 hours of time in service after 1 February 1996, whichever is later. Similarly, the hardware must be retired before 15 calendar years after initial installation or within 100 hours of time in service after 1 February 1996, whichever is later. If the date of initial installation is unknown, the date of manufacture of the aircraft must be used.
The obligations imposed by this AD on the parties or entities it governs include conducting the inspection and replacement of the specified wing hardware in accordance with the Beechcraft Shop Manual or Maintenance Manual as referenced. The manual instructions must be followed precisely to ensure the safety of the aircraft and compliance with the AD. Furthermore, if the date of initial installation is unknown, the manufacturer's date must be used to determine the compliance timelines. The AD also requires that unserviceable hardware be rendered unfit for use after inspection and replacement.
Failure to comply with this AD can result in serious consequences, including potential safety hazards and violations of aviation regulations. The AD does not explicitly outline specific penalties for non-compliance, but it is understood that non-compliance with ADs can lead to civil or criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment, under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The severity of the penalties may depend on the extent of the non-compliance and the impact on aviation safety. The CASA delegate has the authority to enforce compliance and take appropriate action against those who fail to adhere to the AD.