COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Beechcraft 33 and 35-33 (Debonair/Bonanza) Series Aeroplanes
AD/BEECH 33/28 Elevator Control Push Rods 5/80
Applicability: All models 35-33, 35-A33, 35-B33, 35-C33, E33, F33 and G33 with S/Nos. CD-1 to CD-1304;
All models C33A, E33A and F33A with S/Nos. CE-1 to CE-235, CE-249, CE-250 and CE-270 to CE-803;
All models E33C and F33C with S/Nos. CJ-1 to CJ-148.
Requirement: Action in accordance with Beechcraft SI No. 1019. Compliance: Within 100 hours time in service after 31 May 1980.
Background: Corrosion has been found in the elevator pushrods of other models of Beech aircraft which have pushrods of similar manufacture.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Commonwealth of Australia, form a comprehensive regulatory framework designed to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation within Australia. Part 39 of these regulations, specifically addressing Airworthiness Directives, serves to maintain the airworthiness of aircraft through the issue of safety-critical directives. One such directive, AD/BEECH 33/28, focuses on the Beechcraft 33 and 35-33 (Debonair/Bonanza) series aeroplanes and mandates action regarding elevator control push rods to mitigate the risk of corrosion. This directive applies to specific serial numbers of the affected models and requires compliance within 100 hours of time in service after 31 May 1980, reflecting a proactive approach to addressing safety concerns identified in similar aircraft models.
The policy objective behind this directive is to enhance aviation safety by preventing potential structural failures that could arise from corrosion in the elevator control push rods. The directive is issued under the authority of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, which is tasked with the regulation of civil aviation safety. By implementing this directive, the Australian government aims to ensure that operators of the affected Beechcraft models adhere to specific maintenance requirements to preserve the structural integrity of their aircraft, thereby safeguarding passengers and crew.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically PART 39 - 105, pertains to the airworthiness directives issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) concerning the Beechcraft 33 and 35-33 (Debonair/Bonanza) series aeroplanes. This regulation applies to the specified models and serial numbers of these aircraft, mandating compliance with Beechcraft Service Instruction No. 1019 to address corrosion in the elevator control pushrods. The directive applies to all Beechcraft 35-33, 35-A33, 35-B33, 35-C33, E33, F33, and G33 series with specific serial numbers, as well as C33A, E33A, F33A, E33C, and F33C models with certain serial numbers. The requirement necessitates corrective action within 100 hours of the aircraft's time in service following 31 May 1980, due to identified issues with pushrod corrosion, which has been observed in similar models. The scope of the Act is national, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia, and it does not explicitly mention exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within the provided text.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, address the safety requirements for certain models of Beechcraft aeroplanes. The regulation in question, AD/BEECH 33/28, pertains to the elevator control pushrods of Beechcraft 33 and 35-33 (Debonair/Bonanza) series aeroplanes. This regulation applies to specific serial numbers of various models, including the 35-33, 35-A33, 35-B33, 35-C33, E33, F33, G33, C33A, E33A, F33A, E33C, and F33C. The requirement set out in the regulation mandates that the action specified in Beechcraft Service Instruction No. 1019 be taken regarding the elevator control pushrods. This compliance must be achieved within 100 hours of time in service after 31 May 1980. The directive aims to address corrosion issues identified in similar pushrods of other Beechcraft models, ensuring the continued airworthiness of these aircraft.
The obligations under this regulation are clear and specific. Operators of the affected Beechcraft models must adhere to the instructions outlined in Beechcraft Service Instruction No. 1019. This typically involves inspecting and potentially replacing the elevator control pushrods to prevent the onset of corrosion. The timeline for compliance is stringent, demanding that the specified actions be completed within 100 hours of time in service following the specified date, 31 May 1980. Failure to comply with this directive could result in the aeroplane being deemed unairworthy, thereby risking safety and regulatory breaches.
For entities and individuals who fail to comply with the requirements outlined in AD/BEECH 33/28, there are potential legal consequences. Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) regulations can impose penalties for non-compliance with airworthiness directives. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the regulation itself, generally, breaches of airworthiness standards can lead to fines, enforcement actions, and in severe cases, grounding of the aircraft. The maximum penalties could include substantial financial fines and potential criminal charges if the non-compliance is found to have caused harm or endangered safety. Ensuring adherence to these directives is thus crucial for maintaining compliance with aviation safety standards.