COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Beechcraft 200 (Super King Air) Series Aeroplanes
AD/BEECH 200/6 Wing Tip Fuel Filler Anti-Siphon
Door Assembly
Applicability: Model 200 with S/Nos BB-2 to BB-61.
Requirement: Action in accordance with Beechcraft SI No 0764-287. Compliance: Within 100 hours time in service after 16 April 1976.
4/76
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended, are central to the regulation of civil aviation in Australia, with specific focus on ensuring the safety and efficiency of the national airspace. One such legislative instrument is F2006B03712, enacted to address safety issues associated with the Beechcraft 200 (Super King Air) Series Aeroplanes. This legislative instrument was introduced to ensure the safety of these aircraft by mandating specific maintenance and operational requirements. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), as the regulatory body, enacted this directive to mitigate identified risks associated with the wing tip fuel filler anti-siphon door assembly in certain models of the Beechcraft 200 series. The policy objective is to enforce compliance with Beechcraft Service Information (SI) No 0764-287, ensuring the aircraft maintain airworthiness standards within a stipulated timeframe, thereby safeguarding both crew and passengers.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Regulations, specifically Part 39 - 105, mandates compliance with Airworthiness Directives for particular aircraft models to ensure safety and operational reliability. The directive AD/BEECH 200/6 focuses on Beechcraft 200 (Super King Air) Series aeroplanes, specifically those with serial numbers BB-2 to BB-61. These regulations apply to the aircraft owners and operators, requiring them to implement actions in accordance with Beechcraft Service Instruction No 0764-287. The directive necessitates that the specified action related to the wing tip fuel filler anti-siphon door assembly be completed within 100 hours of the aircraft's time in service after 16 April 1976. This directive is a pivotal part of the overarching regulatory framework that ensures compliance and maintenance standards are met to maintain airworthiness and safety within the national airspace.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically AD/BEECH 200/6, mandate particular actions for the maintenance and operation of the Beechcraft 200 (Super King Air) Series Aeroplanes. The directive (section 4/76) applies to aircraft with serial numbers BB-2 to BB-61. The requirement is for compliance with Beechcraft Service Instruction No 0764-287, focusing on the wing tip fuel filler anti-siphon door assembly. This directive requires that the specified action be completed within 100 hours of the aircraft being in service after April 16, 1976.
The obligations imposed by this Act on the parties or entities it governs are centred around ensuring the safety and compliance of the Beechcraft 200 aeroplanes within the specified serial number range. Owners, operators, and maintenance personnel must adhere to the stipulations of the Beechcraft Service Instruction No 0764-287, which likely includes inspections, repairs, or replacements of the wing tip fuel filler anti-siphon door assembly. Failure to comply with these requirements can lead to significant safety risks, thus the mandate is clear and non-negotiable.
Any breach of the provisions outlined in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 can result in serious consequences. While specific offences, penalties, or consequences are not detailed in the excerpt, it is understood that non-compliance with airworthiness directives can lead to penalties under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The maximum penalties for breaches can include fines up to $210,000 for individuals and significantly higher for corporations, along with potential imprisonment. Furthermore, operational penalties might include grounding of the aircraft until compliance is verified, which can have severe financial and logistical implications for operators.