COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Beagle B206 Series Aeroplanes
AD/BEA 206/2 Propeller Control Rod End Fitting 12/66 Applicability: Model B206 Series 1 S/Nos. B007, B009, B013, B019, B022, B026, B038 and B039. Requirement: Action in accordance with Beagle Mod. No. 593.
Compliance: Before 1 September 1971.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Commonwealth of Australia, were introduced to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework governing all aspects of civil aviation within the country, including airworthiness standards and safety directives. One such directive, AD/BEA 206/2, targets the Beagle B206 Series Aeroplanes, specifically addressing the propeller control rod end fitting through modification according to Beagle Model No. 593. This directive applies to certain serial numbers of the Model B206 Series 1, with the requirement that compliance must be achieved before 1 September 1971. The overarching objective of these regulations is to ensure the safety and airworthiness of aircraft operating within Australian airspace, thereby protecting passengers, crew, and the general public from aviation-related hazards.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives under the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 applies to specific aircraft models, in this case, the Beagle B206 Series aeroplanes with serial numbers B007, B009, B013, B019, B022, B026, B038, and B039. This legislation mandates compliance with the requirements outlined in Beagle Modification No. 593 for the propeller control rod end fitting, with a compliance deadline before 1 September 1971. The regulation's geographic and jurisdictional reach is confined to the Commonwealth of Australia, as CASA is the regulatory body responsible for civil aviation safety across the nation. The directive applies to the specified aircraft models within Australia and does not explicitly mention any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds. The effectiveness and scope of the directive can potentially be extended or modified through subordinate instruments issued by CASA, ensuring the ongoing safety and airworthiness of the affected aircraft.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, address the airworthiness directives concerning the Beagle B206 Series aeroplanes, particularly focusing on the propeller control rod end fitting. The regulation is codified under AD/BEA 206/2, which outlines the mandatory actions for certain serial numbers of the B206 model. Serial numbers B007, B009, B013, B019, B022, B026, B038, and B039 are explicitly mentioned in the directive, and compliance must be achieved in line with Beagle Modification No. 593. This directive mandates that any required actions must be completed before 1 September 1971 to ensure continued compliance with airworthiness standards.
The obligations imposed by this regulation are clear and direct. Owners and operators of the specified B206 series aeroplanes must adhere to the compliance timeline and ensure that the propeller control rod end fittings are modified as per Beagle Modification No. 593. This includes conducting necessary inspections, making any required repairs, or implementing modifications to meet the safety standards stipulated in the directive. The onus is on the aircraft owners or operators to verify that the modifications are correctly and thoroughly implemented to avoid any potential safety issues.
Failure to comply with the provisions outlined in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 can result in significant consequences. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the excerpt provided, it is understood that breaches of airworthiness directives can lead to severe penalties under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. These penalties may include fines, suspension or revocation of the aircraft's certificate of airworthiness, and potential criminal charges for individuals or companies found guilty of non-compliance. The exact penalties depend on the severity of the breach and the discretion of the court or regulatory authority involved.