AD/B767/187 Amdt 1 - Aft Pressure Bulkhead Insulation Blankets

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2007L04521 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988

CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998

ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.  Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products.  Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry.  ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness.  Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.  When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.

The US FAA issued AD 2003-13-03, affecting Boeing B767 model aircraft, in 2003.  The USA is the State of Design for this type.  As a result of a request from industry, CASA has amended the equivalent Australian AD to allow use of a revised Boeing Service Bulletin.  The amended AD, AD/B767/187, Amendment 1, will become effective on 20 December 2007.  This AD cancels and replaces the previous issue.

As this AD is issued because of Australia’s obligations under Convention on International Civil Aviation, and because it is issued in response to an AD raised by the relevant State of Design, no consultation of the Australian public has taken place on this AD.  The Office of Best Practice Regulation  has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.

 

The AD has been made by the Manager, Airframes in the Airworthiness Engineering Branch, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Act 1988, enacted by the Australian Parliament, was introduced to establish a comprehensive framework for the regulation of civil aviation in Australia. This Act provides the authority for the issuance of airworthiness directives (ADs) to ensure the safety of air navigation. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, made under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, further detail the processes and requirements for ADs. Regulation 39.001 of these regulations empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue ADs concerning specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products, which are subsequently treated as legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. These regulations and directives are crucial for maintaining the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, aligning with Australia's international obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The ADs are typically issued in response to actions taken by the State of Design, such as the United States in the case of the Boeing B767 model aircraft, and are implemented to ensure compliance with safety standards set by international agreements.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Act 1988, along with the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, establishes the framework under which the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) issues airworthiness directives (ADs). These directives apply to specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products to ensure the safety of air navigation. The authority to issue these directives under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 is exercised by CASA to mandate safety requirements, which are legally binding. These directives are issued in accordance with international standards as outlined in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, and they reflect the obligations of the State of Design, which in the case of the Boeing B767 model aircraft, is the United States. CASA, as Australia's national airworthiness authority, has the responsibility to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft on the Australian Register, which includes assessing and, if necessary, issuing Australian ADs in response to directives from the State of Design. The ADs are legislative instruments that are subject to disallowance and are not required to undergo public consultation or a Regulatory Impact Statement, as determined by the Office of Best Practice Regulation. This specific AD, AD/B767/187, Amendment 1, is a response to an earlier AD issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and is designed to align with the revised Boeing Service Bulletin, effective from 20 December 2007.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Act 1988, particularly section 98, empowers the Governor-General to establish regulations for the Act's purposes and in the interests of air navigation safety. This foundational provision allows for the creation of subsequent regulatory frameworks that support the overarching aim of ensuring safe air travel. Regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 extends this authority to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), enabling it to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These directives are crucial for maintaining the safety and airworthiness of aircraft, as they outline mandatory requirements and procedures that must be adhered to by the relevant parties. Under subregulation 39.001(5), airworthiness directives are classified as disallowable instruments under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and thus, they are considered legislative instruments as per section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. This classification underscores their regulatory significance and the legal framework within which they operate. Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation further delineates the responsibilities of the State of Design and the State of Registry in ensuring the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. The State of Design, in this case the USA for the Boeing B767 model aircraft, is responsible for providing necessary information to ensure airworthiness, while the State of Registry, represented by CASA in Australia, must implement and enforce these requirements. The obligations imposed by the ADs are stringent and multifaceted. CASA, as Australia's national airworthiness authority, must meticulously assess any ADs issued by the State of Design, such as the US FAA's AD 2003-13-03 for Boeing B767 aircraft. If deemed necessary, CASA must issue corresponding Australian ADs that mandate the same requirements. This process ensures that Australian-registered aircraft meet international safety standards and maintain airworthiness. The ADs are designed to be comprehensive, often allowing for specific industry inputs, as seen in the case of AD/B767/187, Amendment 1, which incorporates a revised Boeing Service Bulletin and will replace its predecessor upon its effective date of 20 December 2007. Breach of the obligations set forth in these airworthiness directives can result in significant legal consequences. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, along with the Civil Aviation Act 1988, outline various offences that may arise from non-compliance with ADs. Such offences could lead to both civil and criminal penalties. While the exact penalties are not detailed in the provided text, they generally include fines and potential imprisonment, reflecting the seriousness of ensuring aviation safety. The legislative framework is designed to maintain high safety standards, and any deviation from the mandated requirements can thus have serious repercussions for the parties involved.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Enforcement Powers
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.