COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Boeing 737 Series Aeroplanes
AD/B737/7 Fuselage Frames Adjacent to Forward Airstair 8/85
Applicability: All model 737 aircraft, Line Numbers 1 to 880.
Requirement: 1. FAA AD 85-01-06, Amendment 39-4982, up to and including Section F, but excluding Section E.
2. Boeing SB 737-53A1064, Revision 3. Compliance: As detailed in Requirement Document No 1.
Background: There have been numerous reports of cracking in the fuselage frames adjacent to the forward airstair doorway cut-out. Cracking of the frames and door cut-out internal doubler could result in a sudden loss of cabin pressure, and possibly blowout of the airstair door.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Commonwealth of Australia's Parliament, aim to ensure the safety of civil aviation within Australia. Within this framework, Part 39 - 105 Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives includes AD/B737/7, which pertains to the fuselage frames adjacent to the forward airstair of Boeing 737 Series aeroplanes. This directive was introduced to address the problem of reported cracking in these critical fuselage areas, which could potentially lead to catastrophic consequences such as sudden loss of cabin pressure and blowout of the airstair door. The policy objective of the directive is to mandate specific compliance requirements, as outlined in FAA AD 85-01-06 and Boeing SB 737-53A1064, to mitigate these risks and ensure the continued airworthiness of affected aircraft.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, applies to all model 737 aircraft with Line Numbers ranging from 1 to 880, ensuring adherence to safety directives concerning the fuselage frames adjacent to the forward airstair. The regulation mandates compliance with FAA AD 85-01-06, Amendment 39-4982, up to and including Section F, but excluding Section E, as well as Boeing SB 737-53A1064, Revision 3, as outlined in Requirement Document No 1. These directives are crucial in addressing the safety concern of cracking in the fuselage frames, which could lead to a sudden loss of cabin pressure and potential blowout of the airstair door. This legislative instrument thus ensures that all specified Boeing 737 aircraft are maintained to a standard that mitigates the risks associated with structural failure in this critical area.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105 concerning the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, include detailed provisions for the maintenance and safety of Boeing 737 Series Aeroplanes. One significant directive, AD/B737/7, pertains to the fuselage frames adjacent to the forward airstair (section 1). This directive applies to all model 737 aircraft, from Line Numbers 1 to 880 (section 2). The main requirements outlined in this directive are detailed in FAA AD 85-01-06, Amendment 39-4982, up to and including Section F, with the exclusion of Section E (section 1). Additionally, compliance must also be ensured with Boeing SB 737-53A1064, Revision 3 (section 2).
Under the Civil Aviation Regulations, the primary obligation for airlines and maintenance providers is to ensure that the specified fuselage frames are inspected and repaired or replaced as necessary to prevent cracking. This includes adhering to the guidelines and specifications laid out in the FAA and Boeing documents mentioned (section 1). Compliance with these documents is critical, as they provide the technical details and procedures necessary to address the identified safety issues (section 1). Failure to comply with these requirements can lead to serious safety risks, including potential loss of cabin pressure and the possibility of the airstair door blowing out (section 1).
In terms of enforcement and penalties, the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 include provisions for both civil and criminal consequences for non-compliance with airworthiness directives. Civil penalties may include fines and other administrative actions, while criminal penalties could involve imprisonment, particularly in cases where non-compliance results in accidents or fatalities. The specific penalties are determined by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority and can vary depending on the severity and intent of the violation. It is important for operators to understand that the authority takes these directives seriously and will take appropriate action against any breaches (section 1).